Since Seeding would be different than BCS Ranking , this is what I think happens
1998:
Seeding: 1. Tennessee, 2. Florida St, 3. Ohio St, 4. UCLA
Semi Final: Tennessee over UCLA, Florida St over Ohio St
Final: Tennessee over Florida St
1999:
Seeding: 1. Florida St, 2. Virginia Tech, 3. Nebraska, 4. Kansas St
Semi Finals: Florida St over Kansas St, Virginia Tech over Nebraska
Finals: Florida St over Virginia Tech
2000:
Seeding: 1. Oklahoma, 2. Miami , 3. Florida St, 4. Washington
Semi Finals: Washington over Oklahoma, Miami over Florida St
Finals: Miami over Washington
2001:
Seeding: 1. Miami, 2. Oregon , 3. Nebraksa, 4. Colorado
Semi Finals: Miami over Colorado, Oregon over Nebraska
Finals: Miami over Oregon(But the title game is more competitive than OTL)
2002:
Seeding: 1. Miami, 2. Ohio St, 3. Georgia, 4. Iowa
Semi Finals: Miami over Iowa, Ohio St over Georgia
Finals: Miami over Ohio St
2003:
Seeding: 1. LSU, 2. USC, 3. Oklahoma, 4. Michigan
Semi Finals: LSU over Michigan, USC over Oklahoma
Finals: USC over LSU
2004:
Seeding: 1. USC, 2. Auburn, 3. Oklahoma , 4. Utah
Semi Finals: USC over Utah, Auburn over Oklahoma
Finals: USC over Auburn
2005:
Seeding: 1. USC, 2. Texas, 3. Penn State, 4. Ohio St
Semi Finals: USC over Ohio St, Texas over Penn State
Finals: USC over Texas(Texas only won due to Vince Young having a record game and only at last second)
2006:
Seeding:1. Ohio St, 2. Florida, 3. Michigan , 4. Boise St
Semi Finals: Boise St over Ohio St, Florida over Michigan
Final: Florida over Boise St
2007:
Seeding:1. Ohio St, 2. LSU , 3. Oklahoma, 4. Virginia Tech
Semi Finals: Ohio St over Virginia Tech, LSU over Oklahoma
Finals: LSU over Ohio St
2008:
Seeding: 1. Oklahoma, 2. Florida, 3. Utah, 4. USC
Semi Finals: USC over Oklahoma, 2. Florida over Utah
Finals: Florida over USC
2009:
Seeding: 1. Alabama, 2.Texas , 3. Cincinnati, 4. Boise St
Semi Finals: 1. Alabama over Boise St, Texas over Cincinnati
Finals: Alabama over Texas
2010:
Seeding: 1. Auburn, 2. Oregon, 3. TCU, 4. Wisconsin
Semi Finals: Auburn over Wisconsin, Oregon over TCU
Finals: Oregon over Auburn(I think the long layover cost us this game in OTL)
2011:
Seeding: 1. LSU, 2. Oklahoma St, 3. Alabama, 4. Stanford
Semi Finals: LSU over Stanford , Alabama over Oklahoma St
Finals: Alabama over LSU
2012:
Seeding: 1. Alabama, 2. Oregon, 3. Notre Dame(Remember FSU was ranked number 3 despite being only undefeated team), 3. Kansas St
Semi Finals: Alabama over Oklahoma St , Oregon over Notre Dame
Finals: Oregon over Alabama
2013:
Seeding: 1. Florida St, 2. Auburn, 3. Michigan St, 4. Alabama
Semi Finals: Florida St over Alabama, Auburn over Michigan St
Finals: Florida St over Auburn
What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- Blazers-1977
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:13 pm
What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
Last edited by Blazers-1977 on Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- DuckMastaFunk
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
Oregon over 'bama in 2012?? I'm not sure about that one. That was our best chance to win a national championship. If we hit a field goal against Stanford we go the the BCS title and steamroll a very overrated but undefeated Notre Dame team.
For 2010, I won't dispute that because I feel if we played that game 100 times, we would win roughly 50 of them
For 2010, I won't dispute that because I feel if we played that game 100 times, we would win roughly 50 of them
- Blazers-1977
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:13 pm
Re: What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
Bama struggled against high powered offenses that year and that Texas A&M game showed it and Oregon was much much more high powered then Texas A&M. I think the Final Score would be Oregon 31 Alabama 27 as Mariota would rip through Bama's defense although Barner would be shutdown just like LaMichael was vs Auburn but the main difference would be that Mariota was better than Darron Thomas and we didnt have player like De'Anthony Thomas in 2010.DuckMastaFunk wrote:Oregon over 'bama in 2012?? I'm not sure about that one. That was our best chance to win a national championship. If we hit a field goal against Stanford we go the the BCS title and steamroll a very overrated but undefeated Notre Dame team.
For 2010, I won't dispute that because I feel if we played that game 100 times, we would win roughly 50 of them
- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 12362
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
That's the only year in Oregon history I'm very confident in saying Oregon WAS the best team in the nation. They were so dominant and had NFL talent across the board. They literally just had one extremely unprepared game where they couldn't have played worse and they barely lost to a lucky and ref-aided Stanford team. That will always be to me the worst loss in Oregon history.DuckMastaFunk wrote:Oregon over 'bama in 2012?? I'm not sure about that one. That was our best chance to win a national championship. If we hit a field goal against Stanford we go the the BCS title and steamroll a very overrated but undefeated Notre Dame team.
For 2010, I won't dispute that because I feel if we played that game 100 times, we would win roughly 50 of them
As for 2010, I think Oregon was a little better, but hard to say for sure. I do know with how the game played out that if the refs did their job Oregon would've been crowned national champions. Stole a defensive touchdown by prematurely calling Scam Newton down when not a single part of his body was touching the ground, stole a Cliff Harris interception when by the rule he was down before he lost the ball and therefore did not need to maintain possession, called a fake delay of game on Oregon that resulted in a 30 yard favor for Auburn, and missed an obvious delay of game on Auburn on a play they scored a touchdown. Also missed numerous dirty plays after the whistle by Fairly. Basically refs did everything they could to help the SEC team and it worked.
I'm clearly not bitter at all over either game.
- Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
LSU would of beat USC in ‘03
I also think Bama might of lost to Okie State in ‘11
I also think Bama might of lost to Okie State in ‘11
- Blazers-1977
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:13 pm
Re: What if College Football had an playoff instead of BCS
I dont think LSU beats USC in 2003 , USC by the end of the season had almost become as good as the 04 team and I dont think they beat USC in the title game. Maybe if there was a playoff both Miami from 2000-2002 and USC from 2003-2005 3 peat cause Miami only lost in 2002 due to being jobbed by the refs and it took a superhuman performance by Vince Young for them to just barely take down USC.Bud Lee wrote:LSU would of beat USC in ‘03
I also think Bama might of lost to Okie State in ‘11
Actually thinking about it Miami most likely 3 peats , USC leaning towards no as Vince Young could replicate that performance. Of course both would be tainted as both Miami and USC both flagrantly violated NCAA rules