Pistons/Magic

catch 922 · Post by **catch 922** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:15 pm

Pistons Send:
19 1st
20 1st
21 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic Send:
Kyrie Irving

Who really needs a future right? Also I really hate trying to compete with the Nets.

I know this will come up since I asked Ownage already, but I'm hoping I can get an exception on the 4 or less years out rule for 1sts.

jibbajabba614 · Post by **jibbajabba614** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:32 am

I like it for the Pistons. True Frye is aging but even without him, they are a competitive team.. Magic may luck up with a late lotto with one of those picks but with the way teams tank, I doubt it. If Magic can get another pick for Brookd, it may turn good for both.

pudgejeff · Post by **pudgejeff** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:02 am

Agreed.

Oregon Ownage · Post by **Oregon Ownage** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:10 am

catch 922 wrote:Pistons Send:
19 1st
20 1st
21 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic Send:
Kyrie Irving

Who really needs a future right? Also I really hate trying to compete with the Nets.

I know this will come up since I asked Ownage already, but I'm hoping I can get an exception on the 4 or less years out rule for 1sts.

You can only go to year 2020 on trading firsts, cant allow an exception. If I do, whats the point of the rule?

catch 922 · Post by **catch 922** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:19 am

Oregon Ownage wrote:
catch 922 wrote:Pistons Send:
19 1st
20 1st
21 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic Send:
Kyrie Irving

Who really needs a future right? Also I really hate trying to compete with the Nets.

I know this will come up since I asked Ownage already, but I'm hoping I can get an exception on the 4 or less years out rule for 1sts.
You can only go to year 2020 on trading firsts, cant allow an exception. If I do, whats the point of the rule?

The point of the rule is to protect newbies from doing it because they don't understand the value of the 1st 5 years down the line. I guess it also protects from GM's coming in and jumping ship after offloading 1sts 5 years down the line, but I've been here 2 years now and probably will not be jumping ship anywhere in the near future.

Oregon Ownage · Post by **Oregon Ownage** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:01 am

catch 922 wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
catch 922 wrote:Pistons Send:
19 1st
20 1st
21 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic Send:
Kyrie Irving

Who really needs a future right? Also I really hate trying to compete with the Nets.

I know this will come up since I asked Ownage already, but I'm hoping I can get an exception on the 4 or less years out rule for 1sts.
You can only go to year 2020 on trading firsts, cant allow an exception. If I do, whats the point of the rule?
The point of the rule is to protect newbies from doing it because they don't understand the value of the 1st 5 years down the line. I guess it also protects from GM's coming in and jumping ship after offloading 1sts 5 years down the line, but I've been here 2 years now and probably will not be jumping ship anywhere in the near future.

I agree with your points but I dont change rules during the season. We can admend the rule in the offseason with a league vote

Craig · Post by **Craig** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:33 am

Is Kyrie really that much better than Brooks?

catch 922 · Post by **catch 922** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:01 am

Kyries numbers are skewed right now so you cant base it purely off that. His contract is locked up, he is young and developing well and about to hit his prime.

Craig · Post by **Craig** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:04 am

I'm not saying i wouldn't rather have Kyrie, i just struggle with him being 3 1sts better.

pudgejeff · Post by **pudgejeff** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:58 pm

Oregon Ownage wrote:
catch 922 wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
catch 922 wrote:Pistons Send:
19 1st
20 1st
21 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic Send:
Kyrie Irving

Who really needs a future right? Also I really hate trying to compete with the Nets.

I know this will come up since I asked Ownage already, but I'm hoping I can get an exception on the 4 or less years out rule for 1sts.
You can only go to year 2020 on trading firsts, cant allow an exception. If I do, whats the point of the rule?
The point of the rule is to protect newbies from doing it because they don't understand the value of the 1st 5 years down the line. I guess it also protects from GM's coming in and jumping ship after offloading 1sts 5 years down the line, but I've been here 2 years now and probably will not be jumping ship anywhere in the near future.
I agree with your points but I dont change rules during the season. We can admend the rule in the offseason with a league vote

I always thought this was up to the commish's disgression, if not I'm not sure what else can be done but it is a bit frustrating

catch 922 · Post by **catch 922** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:26 pm

Trade 1:
Pistons send:
Aaron Brooks
19 1st
20 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic send:
Kyrie Irving

Trade 2 (not to be processed until start of next season):
Pistons send:
21 1st

Magic send:
Future considerations

pudgejeff · Post by **pudgejeff** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:03 pm

Agreed

Craig · Post by **Craig** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:25 pm

Oregon Ownage · Post by **Oregon Ownage** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:51 pm

catch 922 wrote:Trade 1:
Pistons send:
Aaron Brooks
19 1st
20 1st
Aaron Brooks

Magic send:
Kyrie Irving

Trade 2 (not to be processed until start of next season):
Pistons send:
21 1st

Magic send:
Future considerations

While I dont agree with this circumvention of the rule, it is legal.

Pistons gets younger and have Irving locked in through his prime.

Magic turned Melo into 3 future picks, not the best return safe to say

Pistons/Magic

Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic Trade

Re: Pistons/Magic Trade

Re: Pistons/Magic Trade

Re: Pistons/Magic Trade

Re: Pistons/Magic Trade

Re: Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic Trade

Re: Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic

Re: Pistons/Magic