Nets/Blazers, DONE

Post Completed Trades Here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

cordy02c
Senior
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm

Nets/Blazers, DONE

Post by cordy02c »

Blazers trade
1990 2nd round pick
1991 2nd round pick
Derek Smith

Nets trade
Tyrone Corbin
User avatar
DmoneyDuck
Freshman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by DmoneyDuck »

I agree to this trade
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by Phenom »

Why would the Blazers do that?
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by pudgejeff »

Phenom wrote:Why would the Blazers do that?
What are the Blazers even giving up?
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by Phenom »

pudgejeff wrote:
Phenom wrote:Why would the Blazers do that?
What are the Blazers even giving up?
Wait, I thought one of the picks was a 1st rounder.
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by pudgejeff »

Phenom wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
Phenom wrote:Why would the Blazers do that?
What are the Blazers even giving up?
Wait, I thought one of the picks was a 1st rounder.
Nope, I was kinda wondering why the nets would do it. It's not horrible for them, but maybe I just value 2nd round pics less than others.
User avatar
DmoneyDuck
Freshman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by DmoneyDuck »

Clears cap space for the Nets. Also, two 2nds for an 8th-9th man in the rotation is fair.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37680
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Salaries don't match. Blazers need to add a little more.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by pudgejeff »

UOducksTK1 wrote:Salaries don't match. Blazers need to add a little more.
Aren't they both under the cap?
User avatar
DmoneyDuck
Freshman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by DmoneyDuck »

I'll throw in Bill Hanzlik (400K, expiring SG). I'll PM Cordy to confirm
cordy02c
Senior
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by cordy02c »

agreed
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37680
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

pudgejeff wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:Salaries don't match. Blazers need to add a little more.
Aren't they both under the cap?
Nets are trading 2.88 (minus 2.0 blazers cap space) = 0.88

Blazers trading 0.5

0.88/0.5 = 1.75 (175% more, so Blazers need to add .27 to make it work, cuz 0.88/.75 = 1.15 = 115%).

Make sense? Very close, but not quite there. Game won't allow the trade.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by pudgejeff »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:Salaries don't match. Blazers need to add a little more.
Aren't they both under the cap?
Nets are trading 2.88 (minus 2.0 blazers cap space) = 0.88

Blazers trading 0.5

0.88/0.5 = 1.75 (175% more, so Blazers need to add .27 to make it work, cuz 0.88/.75 = 1.15 = 115%).

Make sense? Very close, but not quite there. Game won't allow the trade.
Blazers cap isn't updated with the Perkins trade, it still show 4.29 mil free for me, so that's where I was missing.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37680
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Nets/Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

pudgejeff wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:Salaries don't match. Blazers need to add a little more.
Aren't they both under the cap?
Nets are trading 2.88 (minus 2.0 blazers cap space) = 0.88

Blazers trading 0.5

0.88/0.5 = 1.75 (175% more, so Blazers need to add .27 to make it work, cuz 0.88/.75 = 1.15 = 115%).

Make sense? Very close, but not quite there. Game won't allow the trade.
Blazers cap isn't updated with the Perkins trade, it still show 4.29 mil free for me, so that's where I was missing.
Ahhhh gotcha lol, DONE

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
DmoneyDuck
Freshman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Nets/Blazers, DONE

Post by DmoneyDuck »

So did I need to add Hanzlik or no?
Post Reply