nets/rockets

Post Completed Trades Here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

nets/rockets

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Olden Polynice
Horace Grant
Thurl Bailey
Blazers top 10 protected 1st in 1089
orlando woolridge
for
Tim Kempton
Tom Chambers

correct me if I got anything wrong, boom.

accept
Last edited by dd10snoop28 on Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: nets/rockets

Post by vincent1469 »

First blockbuster of the offseason
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: nets/rockets

Post by offtheheezy »

I really like Polynice and Grant. Is a pretty decent haul for Chambers. Rockets starting a rebuild a year early? They don’t have their first this year, but I guess this package was better than what they thought they could get

Perfect for Nets :lol: Blazers should be happy
User avatar
The Bean Regime
Senior
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM

Re: nets/rockets

Post by The Bean Regime »

Not sure how to feel about this one. Nets did just win the ship so on the surface adding a great player in Chambers makes sense. However, they did JUST win the ship. Does it makes sense to sacrifice that many future assets for an older player like Chambers when you're already best of the best? Nets must have been really unimpressed with the rookie duo.

Makes sense for the Rockets. Their title picture is over with Parish being 35 and Dantley 33. It's a good rebuilding offer.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: nets/rockets

Post by offtheheezy »

The Bean Regime wrote:Not sure how to feel about this one. Nets did just win the ship so on the surface adding a great player in Chambers makes sense. However, they did JUST win the ship. Does it makes sense to sacrifice that many future assets for an older player like Chambers when you're already best of the best? Nets must have been really unimpressed with the rookie duo.

Makes sense for the Rockets. Their title picture is over with Parish being 35 and Dantley 33. It's a good rebuilding offer.
Chances of Nets retaining Pierce this offseason with all that unnecessary max cap and no bird rights was pretty low. Took two young potential guys out of the rotation for a better wing replacement on Pierce lets them stay elite I’d say
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: nets/rockets

Post by dd10snoop28 »

ya really like polynice/grant. probably could've held them another year but didn't want to risk a mediocre tc (maybe poor rationale) and them decrease value.

chambers wasn't my ideal target due to his contract but gives me an opportunity to win again next yr if I lose pierce.
Image
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: nets/rockets

Post by dd10snoop28 »

thegoat refused to trade Griffith to me. that was my main target
Image
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: nets/rockets

Post by lukeyrid13 »

offtheheezy wrote:I really like Polynice and Grant. Is a pretty decent haul for Chambers. Rockets starting a rebuild a year early? They don’t have their first this year, but I guess this package was better than what they thought they could get

Perfect for Nets :lol: Blazers should be happy
I mean it clearly shows the Nets are scared of the rematch next year

Also, the Nets GM admits in this thread that he can't develop talent so he again needs to pilfer from someone else.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5674
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: nets/rockets

Post by Boom »

Accept
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5674
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: nets/rockets

Post by Boom »

dd10snoop28 wrote:Olden Polynice
Horace Grant
Thurl Bailey
Blazers top 10 protected 1st in 1089
for
Tim Kempton
Tom Chambers

correct me if I got anything wrong, boom.

accept
Missing Woolridge?
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: nets/rockets

Post by dd10snoop28 »

yup, added woolridge now.
Image
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: nets/rockets

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Bold move so I applaud the Nets for making it

Rockets get a great return and if one the prospects turn into something, its a win for them

Done
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37690
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: nets/rockets

Post by UOducksTK1 »

So we are allowed to trade firsts nearly 1000 years in the past?

I guess Nets can do anything these days and get away with it..

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: nets/rockets

Post by lukeyrid13 »

UOducksTK1 wrote:So we are allowed to trade firsts nearly 1000 years in the past?

I guess Nets can do anything these days and get away with it..
:lol: :lol: And the Nets are supposedly an accountant.

I’ll trade my 322 BC 1st for a PG
User avatar
Foxyg1396
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1041
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:27 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: nets/rockets

Post by Foxyg1396 »

UOducksTK1 wrote:So we are allowed to trade firsts nearly 1000 years in the past?

I guess Nets can do anything these days and get away with it..
Only a witch could trade a 1st from that long ago
Post Reply