Pistons - Grizzlies

Post Completed Trades Here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

DrBradBuss
Junior
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:56 pm
GM: Detroit Pistons GM

Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by DrBradBuss »

Grizzlies Send
Bill Cartwright
‘89 Mavs 1st
‘89 Timberwolves 1st
‘90 Jazz 1st
‘91 Grizzlies 1st (top 3 protected year 1, top 1 protected 2nd year, no protection after)
‘92 Lakers 1st (top 5 protection year 1 into unprotected)

Pistons Send
Magic Johnson
Johnny Rogers

Sorry to see a legend leave Detroit.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by offtheheezy »

Accept. This is the type of deal I was hoping for when I started building up these assets this year.

Contract works perfectly with my timeline, let’s see what I can do with hopefully a true alpha

Good dealing Pistons
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by vincent1469 »

Woah
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Weird that there are not any comments on this trade.

I think Pistons got 2 good picks in the Twolves and Lakers, but no guaranteed star or top pick even seems a little light from their end.
User avatar
Foxyg1396
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:27 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by Foxyg1396 »

If I’m being honest, Magic is a better player than Barkley (for now) and Grizzlies gave up a lot less in Cartwright than cliff, Eaton, and banks. This trade to me seems worse than the deal we had made. Great for Grizzlies for getting Magic and keeping their 92 1st. That wolves 89 is looking decent since they haven’t been able to put up hardly any wins recently
User avatar
the goat
Freshman
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:40 pm
GM: Los Angeles Lakers

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by the goat »

lukeyrid13 wrote:Weird that there are not any comments on this trade.

I think Pistons got 2 good picks in the Twolves and Lakers, but no guaranteed star or top pick even seems a little light from their end.
5 picks isn't 5 picks. I'll explain later :lol:

Great trade for the Grizz. If I were the Pistons I'd probably have waited until the offseason for more suiters.
Lakers GM
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by offtheheezy »

Not sure which guaranteed star or top pick would've been available to them especially given contract matching problems and such and teams rebuilding. With the T-pups getting worse and worse by the sim their pick is increasing in value every 5 days :lol: thanks pups, seems like the pick is a more surefire asset than back in the Denver trade
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Foxyg1396 wrote:If I’m being honest, Magic is a better player than Barkley (for now) and Grizzlies gave up a lot less in Cartwright than cliff, Eaton, and banks. This trade to me seems worse than the deal we had made. Great for Grizzlies for getting Magic and keeping their 92 1st. That wolves 89 is looking decent since they haven’t been able to put up hardly any wins recently
Yep I agree. The Barkley trade really wasn't bad value at all. I think the initial trade shock just caused overreaction

This boils down to, Magic for Twolves 89 (probably #8 pick) and Lakers 92 (who knows but maybe turns in to a Nique trade in 2-3 seasons). Good assets, but not Magic level assets IMO.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5773
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by Boom »

Foxyg1396 wrote:If I’m being honest, Magic is a better player than Barkley (for now) and Grizzlies gave up a lot less in Cartwright than cliff, Eaton, and banks. This trade to me seems worse than the deal we had made. Great for Grizzlies for getting Magic and keeping their 92 1st. That wolves 89 is looking decent since they haven’t been able to put up hardly any wins recently
I believe Detroit has their picks moving forward. You didn’t.
DrBradBuss
Junior
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:56 pm
GM: Detroit Pistons GM

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by DrBradBuss »

Boom wrote:
Foxyg1396 wrote:If I’m being honest, Magic is a better player than Barkley (for now) and Grizzlies gave up a lot less in Cartwright than cliff, Eaton, and banks. This trade to me seems worse than the deal we had made. Great for Grizzlies for getting Magic and keeping their 92 1st. That wolves 89 is looking decent since they haven’t been able to put up hardly any wins recently
I believe Detroit has their picks moving forward. You didn’t.
Yes. And who here has tried to trade a megastar.
Good luck getting back 100% value.
User avatar
Foxyg1396
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:27 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by Foxyg1396 »

Boom wrote:
Foxyg1396 wrote:If I’m being honest, Magic is a better player than Barkley (for now) and Grizzlies gave up a lot less in Cartwright than cliff, Eaton, and banks. This trade to me seems worse than the deal we had made. Great for Grizzlies for getting Magic and keeping their 92 1st. That wolves 89 is looking decent since they haven’t been able to put up hardly any wins recently
I believe Detroit has their picks moving forward. You didn’t.
I also have Bird, Stockton, and then Cliff, banks, and Eaton. I wouldn’t have needed my 1sts in that case
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3804
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by bellsduck »

After all these moves, I can't track what the Grizzlies look like. But picking up Magic is pretty damn impressive. Wish he would've stayed in the East.
Pistons have a couple younger intriguing pieces if they pan out, with a lot of FA money available, and picks?
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by jibbajabba614 »

I tried getting all of blazers picks throughout the 90’s through pick swaps and picks for Pippen and Rodman. Pistons getting 5 1st for Magic isn’t bad. Main issue with Nuggets trade was they didn’t have their firsts. True they would of been a 7-10 seed in west after the trade. But I can see both sides.
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Future picks added to futures thread

Done
Image
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Pistons - Grizzlies

Post by Oregon Ownage »

DrBradBuss wrote:
Boom wrote:
Foxyg1396 wrote:If I’m being honest, Magic is a better player than Barkley (for now) and Grizzlies gave up a lot less in Cartwright than cliff, Eaton, and banks. This trade to me seems worse than the deal we had made. Great for Grizzlies for getting Magic and keeping their 92 1st. That wolves 89 is looking decent since they haven’t been able to put up hardly any wins recently
I believe Detroit has their picks moving forward. You didn’t.
Yes. And who here has tried to trade a megastar.
Good luck getting back 100% value.
Yea thats the downside, you are 95% likely to get 50 cents on the dollar for top end stars b/c its so tough to find the right deal
Image
Post Reply