Buyouts

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
dennocj
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:32 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: Buyouts

Post by dennocj »

The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:This is what a stretched players contract would look like

You get the savings during the years on the current deal but have to then carry it forward which sucks and is your penalty.
Isn't the point that you lose (waive) the player as well? So wouldn't that contract just be moved to the cut salaries?

Also, I believe the first year's salary remains the same if done during the regular season, which would be nice to include. So it shows as your example if they want cap space immediately for FA or something in the offseason, or if your salary is fine for that season, you can wait until the regular season and do a 12, and then 4.5 for the other 6 for future savings.
Yes, you would lose the player but I cant screen grab the cut salaries screen (this was a work around).
The second question is what we would debate if we agree to this. Many moving parts
And of course deciding how to work out the players situation. The player being stretched could be quite good.

Many parts indeed.

But you would lose the player, so whether he’s good or not is irrelevant.
User avatar
The Bean Regime
Senior
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM

Re: Buyouts

Post by The Bean Regime »

dennocj wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:This is what a stretched players contract would look like

You get the savings during the years on the current deal but have to then carry it forward which sucks and is your penalty.
Isn't the point that you lose (waive) the player as well? So wouldn't that contract just be moved to the cut salaries?

Also, I believe the first year's salary remains the same if done during the regular season, which would be nice to include. So it shows as your example if they want cap space immediately for FA or something in the offseason, or if your salary is fine for that season, you can wait until the regular season and do a 12, and then 4.5 for the other 6 for future savings.
Yes, you would lose the player but I cant screen grab the cut salaries screen (this was a work around).
The second question is what we would debate if we agree to this. Many moving parts
And of course deciding how to work out the players situation. The player being stretched could be quite good.

Many parts indeed.

But you would lose the player, so whether he’s good or not is irrelevant.

it's not about the team stretching, it's about the other teams. If someone stretched a starter quality player due to the bad contract and probably age, it would need to be determined how that player signs with a new team. The regular season is particularly tricky, but the offseason isn't quite so clear cut either. Player goes into FA is the obvious move for offseason, but simply dropping him in for the next sim isn't entirely fair, as GMs that spent their cap might have preferred the chance at the stretched player instead (this situation being if the player was stretched in the middle of FA).
User avatar
dennocj
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:32 pm
GM: Indiana Pacers

Re: Buyouts

Post by dennocj »

The Bean Regime wrote:
dennocj wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:This is what a stretched players contract would look like

You get the savings during the years on the current deal but have to then carry it forward which sucks and is your penalty.
Isn't the point that you lose (waive) the player as well? So wouldn't that contract just be moved to the cut salaries?

Also, I believe the first year's salary remains the same if done during the regular season, which would be nice to include. So it shows as your example if they want cap space immediately for FA or something in the offseason, or if your salary is fine for that season, you can wait until the regular season and do a 12, and then 4.5 for the other 6 for future savings.
Yes, you would lose the player but I cant screen grab the cut salaries screen (this was a work around).
The second question is what we would debate if we agree to this. Many moving parts
And of course deciding how to work out the players situation. The player being stretched could be quite good.

Many parts indeed.

But you would lose the player, so whether he’s good or not is irrelevant.

it's not about the team stretching, it's about the other teams. If someone stretched a starter quality player due to the bad contract and probably age, it would need to be determined how that player signs with a new team. The regular season is particularly tricky, but the offseason isn't quite so clear cut either. Player goes into FA is the obvious move for offseason, but simply dropping him in for the next sim isn't entirely fair, as GMs that spent their cap might have preferred the chance at the stretched player instead (this situation being if the player was stretched in the middle of FA).
I see what you’re saying now. My fault, I was thinking in terms of a vaccuum where he’d only be stretched and then be available during offseason FA
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Buyouts

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Anyone else with an opinion regarding buyouts/stretches?
Image
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: Buyouts

Post by Craig »

I’m cool with a stretch provision as long as you can only do it once every X years and as long as it’s done during the draft so they go into the FA Pool.
SUNS GM
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3547
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Buyouts

Post by bellsduck »

Using the Kuzma example, what happens if Kuzma retires after a couple seasons. Would the cap penalty stay in place or would that go away also?
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Buyouts

Post by Oregon Ownage »

bellsduck wrote:Using the Kuzma example, what happens if Kuzma retires after a couple seasons. Would the cap penalty stay in place or would that go away also?
It stays in place. Would act just like a cut player would against the cap

Image
Image
User avatar
TDotDarkwing
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 4:51 pm
GM: Miami Heat
Location: Toronto

Re: Buyouts

Post by TDotDarkwing »

I could go either way.
User avatar
BucksGM
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1211
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 7:49 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks
Location: St Louis

Re: Buyouts

Post by BucksGM »

TDotDarkwing wrote:I could go either way.
Same. Ideally it’d be exclusive to new gms.
Image
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Buyouts

Post by Oregon Ownage »

BucksGM wrote:
TDotDarkwing wrote:I could go either way.
Same. Ideally it’d be exclusive to new gms.
Why though?

If we were to have it, I think it would be for everyone. Why would new GM’s operate under different rules?
Image
Brophdog88
Senior
Posts: 3126
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: Buyouts

Post by Brophdog88 »

Oregon Ownage wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:This is what a stretched players contract would look like

You get the savings during the years on the current deal but have to then carry it forward which sucks and is your penalty.
Isn't the point that you lose (waive) the player as well? So wouldn't that contract just be moved to the cut salaries?

Also, I believe the first year's salary remains the same if done during the regular season, which would be nice to include. So it shows as your example if they want cap space immediately for FA or something in the offseason, or if your salary is fine for that season, you can wait until the regular season and do a 12, and then 4.5 for the other 6 for future savings.
Yes, you would lose the player but I cant screen grab the cut salaries screen (this was a work around).

The second question is what we would debate if we agree to this. Many moving parts
looks at the bottom of the screen shot..... :lol:
Denver Nuggets DASL GM
Brophdog88
Senior
Posts: 3126
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: Buyouts

Post by Brophdog88 »

if the stretch provision were a thing, no GM should ever use it. We don't care about finances, and putting that much dead cap on your team is crippling
Denver Nuggets DASL GM
Post Reply