This^^^^SuperDuck wrote:This^^^^pezsez1 wrote:I don't think anyone has "turned" on Tyner... we all want him to be great, and we believe he can get better.
It's just undeniable though that he hasn't gotten much better since last season, and meanwhile, Royce Freeman is already playing like an upperclassman.
I'm pulling for Tyner. I'm surprised he isn't playing at a higher level.
Tyner
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- QuackininBama
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5154
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am
Re: Tyner
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4817
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Tyner
Tyner has actually play significantly better the last 2 games (especially UCLA). I think at the beginning of the season he was trying to do too much so that he could lock up the starting spot, but his play was horrible as a result. If he can continue to improve on his vision, limit his hesitation before the line, and set up blocks better (like we saw against UCLA) he can become a special back.
Unfortunately, Freeman is improving these aspects of his game at a quicker rate.
Unfortunately, Freeman is improving these aspects of his game at a quicker rate.
- ncduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Re: Tyner
There was one play against UCLA where he ran so hard and quick through the hole it was shocking. If he can continue with that purpose of mind, he'll reach that potential. There's a reason the staff keeps saying they prefer the by committee approach. I think he's just about turned the corner. The timing of the injury this past game must have been frustrating to some degree. I hope he can keep a positive attitude and just be himself. If so, he will get to where we all hope he does.dd10snoop28 wrote:Tyner has actually play significantly better the last 2 games (especially UCLA). I think at the beginning of the season he was trying to do too much so that he could lock up the starting spot, but his play was horrible as a result. If he can continue to improve on his vision, limit his hesitation before the line, and set up blocks better (like we saw against UCLA) he can become a special back.
Unfortunately, Freeman is improving these aspects of his game at a quicker rate.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 15954
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Tyner
While this is true, this is also why you need a RB who can force the issue at times by getting the hard yards. Everyone on the team can run through the big holes, if you want to be The Man, you better learn to make your own holes sometimes and this is where he is behind Byron and Royce.bellsduck wrote:Honestly I think the OL play has gotten better each week also. Vision and decisiveness aside, I was underwhelmed by any of the holes that they were opening the 1st couple weeks of the season.
Any update on his shoulder injury?
- duxforlyfe
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Tyner
I agree, royce seems to always get yards by fighting for every one of them. He is always trying to push the pile, but at the same time he is also significantly bigger than tyner. tyner will get better, but we have royce for a couple more years who hasnt fumbled or been injured.Duck07 wrote:While this is true, this is also why you need a RB who can force the issue at times by getting the hard yards. Everyone on the team can run through the big holes, if you want to be The Man, you better learn to make your own holes sometimes and this is where he is behind Byron and Royce.bellsduck wrote:Honestly I think the OL play has gotten better each week also. Vision and decisiveness aside, I was underwhelmed by any of the holes that they were opening the 1st couple weeks of the season.
Any update on his shoulder injury?
- Phalanx
- Senior
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: Tyner
I was watching an RB who wasn't Marshall of Freeman, and he was making great cuts and getting into the secondary, and I thought Tyner had suddenly improved, and then I realized it was Kenny Bassett, the walk-on. I get that Tyner had a lot of hype coming out of high school, but some guys don't make the transition to college as well as others. Tyner could still turn it around, but currently, he just doesn't look like an Oregon-caliber starting running back to me. When he signed with Oregon, his camp kind of acted like they were doing the ducks a favor. Now, the opposite appears to be closer to the reality. It seems unlikely that he will head to the NFL after his junior season, and I am skeptical that he will make the NFL at all. We'll see. At this point, we are hoping that he is just a late-bloomer.duck541 wrote:Crazy how people have turned on Tyner. I remember when the hype around him was similar to that of Freeman.
I think he ran really well the last two games (UW not included). He was finishing off runs like never before and seemed to turn the corner a bit. He still doesn't have great vision or is the most powerful runner but he was running hard and being a little more decisive. He obviously got hurt on the kickoff and that's why Bassett played. But good for Bassett running the way he did, Campbell is a hell of a coach.
- cmmadness
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:32 pm
Re: Tyner
So glad this kid showed up last night. On both of those touchdowns he looked like a different player.
Love the way he was hitting the hole; and on that first touchdown, having the patience to find it and
twist his way into the endzone.
The future is beyond bright: Marshall, Freeman, Tyner, Charles Nelson, Tony James, and by next year
a healthy Taj Griffin. So much talent and so few footballs.
Love the way he was hitting the hole; and on that first touchdown, having the patience to find it and
twist his way into the endzone.
The future is beyond bright: Marshall, Freeman, Tyner, Charles Nelson, Tony James, and by next year
a healthy Taj Griffin. So much talent and so few footballs.
- Phalanx
- Senior
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: Tyner
Agreed. Tyner looked much better in the few carries that we saw. Here's hoping for more of that in the coming weeks.cmmadness wrote:So glad this kid showed up last night. On both of those touchdowns he looked like a different player.
Love the way he was hitting the hole; and on that first touchdown, having the patience to find it and
twist his way into the endzone.
The future is beyond bright: Marshall, Freeman, Tyner, Charles Nelson, Tony James, and by next year
a healthy Taj Griffin. So much talent and so few footballs.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37660
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: Tyner
We may be reaching new levels with speed combined with power. We used to have horrible weak OLines but we don't anymore, and we also a have some big powerful RB's. I love seeing what Oregon is becoming! Hopefully we're impressing defensive recruits and can start building up a stout defense.
Last edited by OregonFan4Life on Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37660
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Tyner
This is actually a really good point. Once we actually have our lines tuned to what we want, and fix our LB problems, Oregon will be a pretty physical team in the trenches, without losing their skill player speed.OregonFan4Life wrote:We may be reaching new levels with speed combined with power. We used to have horrible weak OLines but we don't anymore, and we also a have some big powerful RB's. I love seeing what Oregon is becoming! Hopefully we're impressingdefensive recruits and can start building up a stout defense.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: Tyner
Exactly! And we're getting more NFL calibre players, and we really have Chip to thank for that. We no longer have what's perceived as a "gimmick" offense and now that the NFL is running this offense, opposing coaches can't use the "Oregon won't prepare you for the NFL" recruiting tactics anymore. If we have a good QB, then i think in 2016 we may have the best team ever in Oregon history. There is a lot of really good young talent currently at Oregon and coming to Oregon.UOducksTK1 wrote:This is actually a really good point. Once we actually have our lines tuned to what we want, and fix our LB problems, Oregon will be a pretty physical team in the trenches, without losing their skill player speed.OregonFan4Life wrote:We may be reaching new levels with speed combined with power. We used to have horrible weak OLines but we don't anymore, and we also a have some big powerful RB's. I love seeing what Oregon is becoming! Hopefully we're impressingdefensive recruits and can start building up a stout defense.