QBR humor

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
QuackininBama
All Pac-12
Posts: 5154
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am

QBR humor

Post by QuackininBama »

Proving that football cannot be boiled down to just numbers and statistics:

Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37660
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: QBR humor

Post by UOducksTK1 »

To me, you take all stats into consideration though. Total QBR is not the best metric to prove who is the best, or at least is only one of a solid handful of metrics to be used.

If you look at Mariota's overall rating, it's 192.2, which leads the nation. If you look at Blake Sims', it's 172.7 (not that hot).

Also 2,283 yards 24 tds and 1 int >> 2,034 15 tds and 3 ints.

And you're right, beyond all the statistics, you have to look at supporting cast, teams played, and heck you really have to watch the player to see if observations match with what statistics say.

With all that being said though, our defense is lacking in many of the criteria by which we judge a team by. I'm actually not as concerned about our defense as I was before. DP has shown the last 3 weeks that he can make adjustments and actually pressure the QB now. Malone/Hardrick can be very difficult to watch, but we are stuck with that for now.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
fpsduck
Senior
Posts: 2863
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:10 am

Re: QBR humor

Post by fpsduck »

Sacks seem to play a larger than necessary part in the total QBR.

How is bad O-line play the QBs fault?
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3904
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: QBR humor

Post by Phalanx »

fpsduck wrote:Sacks seem to play a larger than necessary part in the total QBR.

How is bad O-line play the QBs fault?
I don't know what goes into that final number - it looks like Marcus is kicking everyone's butt in pretty much every category except sacks. I bet the final rating has some kind of 'Plays in the SEC' bonus points or something, just like every other ranking in college football.
User avatar
QuackininBama
All Pac-12
Posts: 5154
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am

Re: QBR humor

Post by QuackininBama »

Phalanx wrote:
fpsduck wrote:Sacks seem to play a larger than necessary part in the total QBR.

How is bad O-line play the QBs fault?
I don't know what goes into that final number - it looks like Marcus is kicking everyone's butt in pretty much every category except sacks. I bet the final rating has some kind of 'Plays in the SEC' bonus points or something, just like every other ranking in college football.
How is Petty not even near the top 10? I know he had an off day, but his numbers this year have been ridiculous.
Post Reply