"We like [La'Mar] on the back end"

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 5394
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

"We like [La'Mar] on the back end"

Post by StevensTechU »

Didn't expect that statement. Mark Helfrich said that while other schools are/were recruiting La'Mar Winston as an offensive player or linebacker, they see him starting "on the back end," i.e., safety.

Also noted that La'Mar is getting to like being more physical, a note that says they are well aware of the concerns of Winston's physicality.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35835
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: "We like [La'Mar] on the back end"

Post by greenyellow »

Interesting that they see him as a safety when everyone else (including him) were saying he'd be a LB.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 5394
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: "We like [La'Mar] on the back end"

Post by StevensTechU »

Yea, it's interesting. That said, he ran a 4.64 at 6'2, 211lbs during the offseason. The athletic ability is there.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37676
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: "We like [La'Mar] on the back end"

Post by UOducksTK1 »

So Dye at LB and Winston at S?

Winston is somewhat undersized for LB, so I can see that.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3108
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: "We like [La'Mar] on the back end"

Post by GrandpaDuck »

Maybe a Nickel strong safety in a 4-2-5. I would be shocked if we don't play a nickel or a 3-4 the majority of the snaps in conference play.
Post Reply