Single coaching thread?

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 5648
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Single coaching thread?

Post by pezsez1 »

Just a thought...

I'm sure everyone here will agree that Oregon's AD isn't going to fire anyone midseason. That seems like common sense, no matter where you are on the spectrum.

With that in mind, why not have one thread be our ongoing "Does the program need to make changes" thread? With that title, the thread could cover the head coach, position coaches, the AD, practice formats, conditioning programs, whatever it is that we think is causing the most problems.

Let's face it... we're four games into the season and this forum is already getting toxic. It kind of sucks. We talk about trying to get new, quality members, but nobody new is going to want to hang around here if our main page is so negative.

We can still have plenty of negative threads -- the play of our D, questionable play calls, etc. will always make for hot topics -- but the different variations of early season "fire the coaches" threads are getting a bit out of hand. I count five on the Autzen front page right now, and we all know these will keep popping up with every upcoming Oregon loss (and even wins that are unnecessarily close).

Could we reign it in a bit while still allowing these discussions to happen? I think everyone here benefits if we allow these discussions in a way that doesn't turn the entire forum toxic.

Just my two cents.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
wepto
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:07 pm

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by wepto »

While I think you're correct in predicting that no one is getting fired mid season, I still think it's an interesting topic and having multiple threads makes the discussion easier to follow. It's just a pain to have to sift through a 20+ page thread.
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8214
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

Disagreement and toxicity are two different things. There's like one poster who's annoying people.
Image
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Iron sharpens iron. I'm fine with it as long as we stay cordial.
Image
GoDucksIn09
Senior
Posts: 3091
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:15 am

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by GoDucksIn09 »

Could someone sharpen the play of our defense please and make it to so it can stop the run? It is one thing for the players to have a meeting for the players... I want to see it happen.
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8214
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

dd10snoop28 wrote:Iron sharpens iron. I'm fine with it as long as we stay cordial.
I've actually been impressed with how civil most of the discussion has been. It's crazy how badly people react to simple discourse.
Image
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 5648
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by pezsez1 »

I've actually been impressed with how civil most of the discussion has been. It's crazy how badly people react to simple discourse.
Most of the people here are pretty civil... only one person seems to be acting kind of OregonLive-ish.

My suggestion was just to make sure we don't have a complete forum implosion like last year, which got pretty ugly for awhile. I had to stop posting here for several weeks last season because the dialogue became intolerable. I don't want to see that happen again, especially over a topic that's frankly not worth worrying about right now. Like I said, there's no way we're doing a midseason coaching change, especially with so little actual reason to do so RIGHT NOW.

During our long stretch of beating the Huskies, one of my favorite things to do the day after the game is to search for Husky fan forums and just revel in the meltdowns.

That's us right now. We're making ourselves into fools.

Is that REALLY what we want?
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
Duckenstein
Freshman
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:43 pm

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by Duckenstein »

pezsez1 wrote:
I've actually been impressed with how civil most of the discussion has been. It's crazy how badly people react to simple discourse.
Most of the people here are pretty civil... only one person seems to be acting kind of OregonLive-ish.

My suggestion was just to make sure we don't have a complete forum implosion like last year, which got pretty ugly for awhile. I had to stop posting here for several weeks last season because the dialogue became intolerable. I don't want to see that happen again, especially over a topic that's frankly not worth worrying about right now. Like I said, there's no way we're doing a midseason coaching change, especially with so little actual reason to do so RIGHT NOW.

During our long stretch of beating the Huskies, one of my favorite things to do the day after the game is to search for Husky fan forums and just revel in the meltdowns.

That's us right now. We're making ourselves into fools.

Is that REALLY what we want?
IMO you're overstating it and as a mostly lurker, you're posts tend to stand out as much as the occasional O Live type comment.

My suggestion, let it be. This is a fan forum, there's room for everyone under the tent.

If it gets out of hand, that's another story
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 5648
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by pezsez1 »

IMO you're overstating it and as a mostly lurker, you're posts tend to stand out as much as the occasional O Live type comment.
If I stand out in that way, it's because I'm responding to someone who addressed me directly... and I always try to back up my posts with logic and reason. I don't do personal attacks. But I also don't back down when someone calls me out.

The one exception is the obviously sarcastic thread I just made.

Last season got pretty ugly in here. Lots of petty namecalling, finger-pointing, taking people out of context, etc. And I'm not the only person who had to step back for awhile. I could easily see that happening again unless either 1) People tone down or contain the negativity, or 2) people with opposing opinions don't participate in discussions.

I'd prefer letting people be as negative as they want, but not letting that negativity permeate the entire board. But I'll roll with the masses.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4313
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by SuperDuck »

pezsez1 wrote:
IMO you're overstating it and as a mostly lurker, you're posts tend to stand out as much as the occasional O Live type comment.
If I stand out in that way, it's because I'm responding to someone who addressed me directly... and I always try to back up my posts with logic and reason. I don't do personal attacks. But I also don't back down when someone calls me out.

The one exception is the obviously sarcastic thread I just made.

Last season got pretty ugly in here. Lots of petty namecalling, finger-pointing, taking people out of context, etc. And I'm not the only person who had to step back for awhile. I could easily see that happening again unless either 1) People tone down or contain the negativity, or 2) people with opposing opinions don't participate in discussions.

I'd prefer letting people be as negative as they want, but not letting that negativity permeate the entire board. But I'll roll with the masses.
I agree with you, Pez.
John 3:36
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8214
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

pezsez1 wrote:
I've actually been impressed with how civil most of the discussion has been. It's crazy how badly people react to simple discourse.
Most of the people here are pretty civil... only one person seems to be acting kind of OregonLive-ish.

My suggestion was just to make sure we don't have a complete forum implosion like last year, which got pretty ugly for awhile. I had to stop posting here for several weeks last season because the dialogue became intolerable. I don't want to see that happen again, especially over a topic that's frankly not worth worrying about right now. Like I said, there's no way we're doing a midseason coaching change, especially with so little actual reason to do so RIGHT NOW.

During our long stretch of beating the Huskies, one of my favorite things to do the day after the game is to search for Husky fan forums and just revel in the meltdowns.

That's us right now. We're making ourselves into fools.

Is that REALLY what we want?
I certainly don't want it to get like it was last year; I was part of that intolerable dialogue and actually took a long break from the forum because I felt like I had gone off the deep end a bit regarding Pellum ha.

Again though, I don't think we're that bad. And definitely not anything like the Husky forums. I would do the same thing as you and I don't think we're even close to that. Post game overreaction threads are inevitable, even in when a team is playing really well. It's never quite good enough.
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37660
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by UOducksTK1 »

My posts are all civil and perfect. Just saying..

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
justducky0
Senior
Posts: 2013
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The Real World

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by justducky0 »

SuperDuck wrote:
pezsez1 wrote:
IMO you're overstating it and as a mostly lurker, you're posts tend to stand out as much as the occasional O Live type comment.
If I stand out in that way, it's because I'm responding to someone who addressed me directly... and I always try to back up my posts with logic and reason. I don't do personal attacks. But I also don't back down when someone calls me out.

The one exception is the obviously sarcastic thread I just made.

Last season got pretty ugly in here. Lots of petty namecalling, finger-pointing, taking people out of context, etc. And I'm not the only person who had to step back for awhile. I could easily see that happening again unless either 1) People tone down or contain the negativity, or 2) people with opposing opinions don't participate in discussions.

I'd prefer letting people be as negative as they want, but not letting that negativity permeate the entire board. But I'll roll with the masses.
I agree with you, Pez.

Pez for Pres
Image
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 15954
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by Duck07 »

I think a big problem right now was bringing Pellum back. It seems pretty clear too that he won't be back based on how his unit has played.
Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3904
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Single coaching thread?

Post by Phalanx »

It is interesting to see the lines being drawn this year. last year, a few, including myself, were very concerned about the pipeline at QB and at linebacker, and felt that the coaching staff had really dropped the ball in recruiting and developing, particularly at QB. Quite a few more had a serious problem with Pellum. Well, Pellum is not the DC anymore, and we did recruit pretty well at the two positions of need (Corner was possibly another one, but it looks like it is being addressed better in the next class).

Now, I feel weird being on the side defending Helfrich while so many aren't, but really, I feel like he has made significant steps to address the problems. A hole that big in the pipeline can't be fixed immediately. A new defensive scheme probably can't be expected to work wonders when the guy implementing it wasn't even around for a full recruiting cycle this winter.

I think the situation calls for some patience, but I admit that I am a little disappointed in my fellow duck fans for lacking patience. Helfrich is responding to problems. It isn't like we are coming off a string of losing seasons. We are coming off an Alamo Bowl season and we have lost two games so far. Let the dude fix the problems.

P.S. I agree that Pellum is probably past his expiration date. It is very hard to watch the linebackers running around everywhere but where the guy with the ball actually is.
Post Reply