Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by OregonFan4Life »

rockthief wrote:Am I a bad person because Id like another score? This D is somethign!
Are you a bad person for wanting Oregon to score? Never!
Image
rockthief
Senior
Posts: 4183
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:52 am

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by rockthief »

GO GO DUCKS!
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35835
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by greenyellow »

Besides the injuries and all the penalties, it was a rather good game by Oregon. Really thought Colorado would put up more of a fight than they did but the Ducks' D just snuffed out any hope they ever had.
Image
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by OregonFan4Life »

greenyellow wrote:Besides the injuries and all the penalties, it was a rather good game by Oregon. Really thought Colorado would put up more of a fight than they did but the Ducks' D just snuffed out any hope they ever had.
Even when the offense puts up a good game like this they’re still outshined by the defense. Can’t believe how quickly and drastically Avaolos has changed this defense.
Image
whosyourwally
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:52 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by whosyourwally »

Bighonkingduck wrote:We're getting crushed in time of possession!! :lol:
We’re baaaaaaack.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Quietduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:43 pm

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by Quietduck »

OK it's clear that Pac 12 refs believe if the ball is close and the receiver didn't catch it it must be defensive pass interference. I saw one that was right, one that was offensive and a lot that should have been no calls.

On injuries, I saw a lot of boots but no ice not sure if that's good or bad. Usually, serious injuries get extensive icing don't they?
alxtw
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by alxtw »

Our defense played another phenomenal game against an above average offense. Our offense looked good, but I'm not convinced it is good or has improved because it was against an injured and young sub-par defense. If our offense can put up the same numbers and performance next week at UW, it will be a good indicator that our offense has improved and is good.
Merganzer
Senior
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by Merganzer »

Quietduck wrote:OK it's clear that Pac 12 refs believe if the ball is close and the receiver didn't catch it it must be defensive pass interference. I saw one that was right, one that was offensive and a lot that should have been no calls.

On injuries, I saw a lot of boots but no ice not sure if that's good or bad. Usually, serious injuries get extensive icing don't they?
Hard to get a read on injuries. I didn't notice Dye after he left the game. When Breeland was shown on the sideline he looked a bit sullen, saw Holland once and he seemed in good spirits, joking around with another player.
chapelhillduck
Senior
Posts: 2328
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:15 am

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by chapelhillduck »

Troy and Holland’s injuries seem minor according to Cristobal postgame

Breeland, likely not minor


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lmduck

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by lmduck »

chapelhillduck wrote:Troy and Holland’s injuries seem minor according to Cristobal postgame

Breeland, likely not minor


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
specifically said Breelands needs further assessment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
GoDucksTroll
Sophomore
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:34 am

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by GoDucksTroll »

What is going on? And it’s amazing.

Breeland has a hammy or quad injury, Holland’s looked worse. My buddy’s GF was watching the game with me and she’s a doctor with a specialty in related stuff, she’s sure Holland has a ligament tear, and Breeland has a serious quad injury - she said that brace is what they use for serious quad stuff like a tear or rupture.
lmduck

Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by lmduck »

GoDucksTroll wrote:What is going on? And it’s amazing.

Breeland has a hammy or quad injury, Holland’s looked worse. My buddy’s GF was watching the game with me and she’s a doctor with a specialty in related stuff, she’s sure Holland has a ligament tear, and Breeland has a serious quad injury - she said that brace is what they use for serious quad stuff like a tear or rupture.
well MC specifically said Dye’s and Holland’s injuries were ’pretty minor’ per The Oregonian. Suggest you might also want to check Moseleys twitter feed.

Here is the quote fem Thorburn:

https://twitter.com/rgduckfootball/stat ... 20224?s=21

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by Phenom »

User avatar
gogreen55
Senior
Posts: 2286
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:39 pm

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by gogreen55 »

Amazing performance by the defense. Hopefully Dye and Holland are ready to go for the Mutts.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35835
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Colorado @ #13 Oregon (Oct. 11, Fri 7 PM FS1)

Post by greenyellow »

Image
Post Reply