Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2833
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:54 pm
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
ESPN' ratings seem much more reasonable as a whole. Oregon is also a 12
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... t-sweet-16
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... t-sweet-16
-
- All-American
- Posts: 10573
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
So they have UA and UCLA at 3 and 4, and UO at 12? And that seems fair to people? No, we might get upset by Michigan, although I think we win, but even without Boucher we could beat both UA and UCLA at anytime.
- Boom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5674
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
- GM: Houston Rockets
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
buckmarkduck wrote:So they have UA and UCLA at 3 and 4, and UO at 12? And that seems fair to people? No, we might get upset by Michigan, although I think we win, but even without Boucher we could beat both UA and UCLA at anytime.
Those are some really green shades you're wearing
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
He's not wrong.Boom wrote:buckmarkduck wrote:So they have UA and UCLA at 3 and 4, and UO at 12? And that seems fair to people? No, we might get upset by Michigan, although I think we win, but even without Boucher we could beat both UA and UCLA at anytime.
Those are some really green shades you're wearing
- Phalanx
- Senior
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
I don't think the ducks would win every time, but I do think they could take both Arizona and UCLA on a neutral court at least 5 out of 10. Has something significant changed since the Pac 12 tourney, other than Dorsey suddenly asserting himself? I think Oregon is as good as either of those teams. Anyway, we'll see this week.
- Tray Dub
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5004
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
I think we're better than that, but if you look at us post-Boucher we haven't really proved that much. We played Arizona tough but lost, we beat a weak Iona team easily, then we squeaked by a good Rhode Island team. I can understand there being some doubters.
-
- All-American
- Posts: 10573
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
If you look at UO away from matt all year, our games have been a lot like the RI game.Tray Dub wrote:I think we're better than that, but if you look at us post-Boucher we haven't really proved that much. We played Arizona tough but lost, we beat a weak Iona team easily, then we squeaked by a good Rhode Island team. I can understand there being some doubters.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37652
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
Agree with you and buck. With Boucher, we are a top 8 team nationally. Without Boucher and how we've looked on the road (or neurtal court), we are a late teens top 25 team.Tray Dub wrote:I think we're better than that, but if you look at us post-Boucher we haven't really proved that much. We played Arizona tough but lost, we beat a weak Iona team easily, then we squeaked by a good Rhode Island team. I can understand there being some doubters.
It's just the truth. The nice thing about Oregon is the have the ability to beat anyone. Our talent is just as good as almost any other school, we just need to put it altogether (now).
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
Especially with UCLA he's especially not wrong. Az not so much.Phenom wrote:He's not wrong.Boom wrote:buckmarkduck wrote:So they have UA and UCLA at 3 and 4, and UO at 12? And that seems fair to people? No, we might get upset by Michigan, although I think we win, but even without Boucher we could beat both UA and UCLA at anytime.
Those are some really green shades you're wearing
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- brich75
- Senior
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:54 pm
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
I would be okay with 8, then 4, then 2, then 1
- greenyellow
- Moderator
- Posts: 35799
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Re-Seeding the Final 16 Teams
So of that list, only the #1, 7, 12, and 16 teams remain.