Should Altman sub more??

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
DuckMastaFunk
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:07 pm

Should Altman sub more??

Post by DuckMastaFunk »

My uneducated observation is that the team was gassed near the end of the Kansas game. It seemed like in general they were playing harder and exerting more effort - especially on the defensive end. Assuming the effort level is the same, do you think Altman should sub more to keep the starters fresh at the end of the game or is having the best guys at less than 100% still preferable to the bench?
User avatar
justducky0
Senior
Posts: 2013
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The Real World

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by justducky0 »

no.

There are 2 games left, you run your best players hard.
Image
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4747
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by Duck24 »

The team fell apart without Bell, Brooks and Dorsey on the court. Only way you play them more is if one of the regular rotation guys (Benson, Smith or Bigby-Williams) get hot and are actual assets on the court.
duckfan22
Senior
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by duckfan22 »

two games left the starters are not going to want to go out regardless. And everything is situational. Smith can
give minutes and Bigby can also and of course Benson can spell. Hopefully we get the Benson that hits threes.
User avatar
duxforlyfe
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 349
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by duxforlyfe »

justducky0 wrote:no.

There are 2 games left, you run your best players hard.
I agree, but I think bigby will get 15+ minutes against UNC. Bell may get into foul trouble dealing with their bigs and we may not be able to stop them unless bigby and bell are in. Altman is amazing and I trust him to have a great game plan to defend, but sometimes that's not enough. I hope bigby doesn't play that many, it might mean we're struggling.
duckfan22
Senior
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by duckfan22 »

duxforlyfe wrote:
justducky0 wrote:no.

There are 2 games left, you run your best players hard.
I agree, but I think bigby will get 15+ minutes against UNC. Bell may get into foul trouble dealing with their bigs and we may not be able to stop them unless bigby and bell are in. Altman is amazing and I trust him to have a great game plan to defend, but sometimes that's not enough. I hope bigby doesn't play that many, it might mean we're struggling.
Roy Williams is a good coach he's going to attack the inside and see if he can get Bell and Brooks
into foul trouble. Hopefully we stay out of trouble
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 15953
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by Duck07 »

Sure, KBW is likely to play more but I'd guess maybe an extra four minutes is all. Oregon needs to keep doing what it's been doing all season long. Stay small and fast against what is going to be a slow, plodding team with a hobbled PG. Villanova didn't try to go big against them last year and neither should we. Out run them and create easy buckets in transition. Force them to hit outside shots and they will be tinkering their line-up more than we will be.
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37653
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by UOducksTK1 »

I can almost promise you he will be subbing more than he'd like to against NC because of fouls.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 15953
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by Duck07 »

UOducksTK1 wrote:I can almost promise you he will be subbing more than he'd like to against NC because of fouls.
Everyone keeps saying this like it's a fact. UNC tries to force it inside and they may find themselves in a big hole from transition buckets the other way or hoisting bad shots as the clock runs out.
Image
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by Phenom »

Plus, Bell is a very smart defender. Very rarely in foul trouble.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37653
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Duck07 wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:I can almost promise you he will be subbing more than he'd like to against NC because of fouls.
Everyone keeps saying this like it's a fact. UNC tries to force it inside and they may find themselves in a big hole from transition buckets the other way or hoisting bad shots as the clock runs out.
Brooks is in foul trouble every other game. And Bell is going to have his biggest test of the year because he doesn't have Boucher and UNC has some size. I think it's a very reasonable prediction.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
duckfan96
Senior
Posts: 2609
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by duckfan96 »

Oregon comes out hot and builds a lead...UNc won't be able to do the slowdown .oregon utilzes its speed and get unc in foul trouble. My story and I'm sticking to it
duckfan22
Senior
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:48 pm

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by duckfan22 »

duckfan96 wrote:Oregon comes out hot and builds a lead...UNc won't be able to do the slowdown .oregon utilzes its speed and get unc in foul trouble. My story and I'm sticking to it
And who am i to argue... stick to your guns.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37653
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Sorkin drops 20.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Should Altman sub more??

Post by pudgejeff »

If we're making wild predictions...Boucher plays 15 min
Post Reply