Darrell Scott Transfering
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- OreDucks01284
- Senior
- Posts: 3636
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:29 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
Re: Darrell Scott Transfering
i was reading weareSC.com and they said Scott is transfering to USC without source, i kinda think its bs.
-
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7998
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: Darrell Scott Transfering
Maybe his mom needs a new house? It can't be for the playing time or the stats.chump01284 wrote:i was reading weareSC.com and they said Scott is transfering to USC without source, i kinda think its bs.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
- wheaton4prez
- Senior
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Darrell Scott Transfering
Don't blame him. In the Colorado games that I saw he was being used in a weird way as sort of a slash/#2 option similar to Reggie Bush in the NFL. That kid should be a featured #1 back in college.
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:04 am
Re: Darrell Scott Transfering
if the guy cant even start at colorado i doubt he would ever see the field besides kick returns for the trojans.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2833
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
Re: Darrell Scott Transfering
Wasn't conditioning an issue last year? If so, the kid's got to do his part, too.
- UofDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: Darrell Scott Transfering
I remember that too Ran - conditioning. The thing is, if he were allowed, or wanted to come to Oregon, I think Coach Rad would have him shaped up as a total stud. Highest rated back in the country coming out of HS if I remember correctly. To bad for his sake that he didnt come here because our program would of had him at an elite RB status for the NFL by now (in my mind at least)RanDux wrote:Wasn't conditioning an issue last year? If so, the kid's got to do his part, too.