91 PFs

All Draft related information will be here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

Post Reply
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

91 PFs

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Larry Johnson B C C B- B- A
Physically gifted with a mature body already and a low-post force whose game should translate seamlessly. Has a chance to be one of the most exciting player to watch in DASL. Scouts worry about leg injuries that could affect his game. Great insider scorer. Good jump shot. All around defender. And good rebounder. Ideally player at SF. Amazing potential

Doug Smith B C- C- C+ B B
Doug plays like a big guard, as he can create off the dribble and has really solid passing skills. Creates his own shots. Rebounds the ball really well. Good strength, quickness and athletic abilities. Good potential

Dale Davis C+ D D B C+ A
Dale has the size, skill and feel to be a fit at the power forward in today's game. Big bruiser. Solid scorer. More of a mid range, inside scorer. Guards the post great. Rebounds well. Needs to improve on free throw shooting. Great potential

Anthony Avent B- D D C C+ A
Moves very well for his size and uses his length to affect shots on defense. He has a nice little floater and pretty good touch around the bucket, but at this point he's primarily a lob finisher. Needs to improve defensively. Amazing raw potential

Chris Gatling B C+ C- C C+ A
Gatling’s lack of strength will get exposed. However, it won't worry scouts as much when the big man can drill threes and jumpers off the dribble, score on takes past closeouts, initiate fast breaks and block shots from all over the floor. Great potential

John Turner B- C- C- B B C
Plug and play post player who excels defensively in the post. Great post presence who is sound on that end of the court without over-extending himself. Offensive post is good but not great. Solid rebounder. Not much potential but perfect for teams looking for a post player who can contribute tomorrow.

LeRon Ellis B- B- C B B- C
New age swing big man who can stretch post defenders to the three-point line. Doesn’t excel in any of the three areas of offense but very good at all levels. Good post defender but struggles outside the arch so teams looking to play him down might struggle on defense. Average potential.

Pete Chilcutt B- C D+ B C+ B
Top end shooting PF who prefers to pull up with jumpers and catch defenders off guard. Needs to improve finishing at the rim. Good defender across the board but doesn’t show out in any of those areas. Good potential.

Joe Wylie B- C C- B C B
Great athlete who can jump out of the gym with his dunks on the practice court. Quicker than most at his position helps get the edge when driving in the lane but his finishing is lacking. Good jump shot. Average defender but very good shot blocker. Won’t become a rebounder. Good potential.

Marcus Kennedy C C+ C- C+ C A
Amazing potential but very much a project player. Will need at least two seasons of seasoning before he can be judged. Very good jump shot but his inside game is lacking. Some range outside the arch but needs improvement there as well. Below average defender across the board and needs to improve his rebounding positioning.
Image
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: 91 PFs

Post by lukeyrid13 »

I'm surprised LJ isn't restricted to the 4. He will do very well at the SF spot
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 91 PFs

Post by jibbajabba614 »

lukeyrid13 wrote:I'm surprised LJ isn't restricted to the 4. He will do very well at the SF spot
He did play small forward and power forward in RL was the reason I didn’t
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: 91 PFs

Post by Craig »

Not really the criteria to use but oh well
SUNS GM
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 91 PFs

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Craig wrote:Not really the criteria to use but oh well
Normally I try to slide in SG who are PG eligible but if they don’t start PG in RL at least half a season Ownage shuts it down.

Owens and Augmon were limited because a SF with good rebounding abilities playing SG can expose the sim engine. PFs playing SFs haven’t.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5676
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: 91 PFs

Post by Boom »

jibbajabba614 wrote:
Craig wrote:Not really the criteria to use but oh well
Normally I try to slide in SG who are PG eligible but if they don’t start PG in RL at least half a season Ownage shuts it down.

Owens and Augmon were limited because a SF with good rebounding abilities playing SG can expose the sim engine. PFs playing SFs haven’t.
The Melo rule.
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 91 PFs

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Once we get into the 2000’s draft you will be looking for SF who play PF because of outside shooting. Really shows you how basketball evolved.
Post Reply