Questions Thread
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
- duckyoubeavers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
- GM: Toronto Raptors GM
Re: Questions Thread
typical OSU fanpistolpetejr wrote:Wiz has been MIA for over two weeks. Anyone know anything?
Raptors GM
- duckyoubeavers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
- GM: Toronto Raptors GM
Re: Questions Thread
not sure if anyone knows the answer to this.
are players more likely to accept an FA bid with more money overall or more money in year 1?
are players more likely to accept an FA bid with more money overall or more money in year 1?
Raptors GM
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Questions Thread
Year 1 money is most important
But definitely more likely to accept a 7 year deal compared to 2 if first year money is equal
But definitely more likely to accept a 7 year deal compared to 2 if first year money is equal
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Questions Thread
When team A trades a pick swap with team B, that pick swap is locked in between only team A and B right? Team B can’t go trade the pick swap rights with team A to team C and suddenly the swap is between team A and C? Otherwise that would just make it really bad for team A since team B can go trade pick swaps with like the best team in the league and now it went from a swap from maybe (7,10) to (7, 30)
That was my impression but wanted to make sure
That was my impression but wanted to make sure
- vincent1469
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
- GM: Seattle Supersonics
Re: Questions Thread
The way I see it is:
If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Questions Thread
This was my impression too, the swap stays the same but you can trade your end of the swap in a separate deal but it doesn’t affect the original team you swapped with. But wanted to confirmvincent1469 wrote:The way I see it is:
If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Questions Thread
This point is moot b/c u used an unrealistic example of me and nefarious grizz doing a deal together.vincent1469 wrote:The way I see it is:
If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Questions Thread
The only times I see it as bad is if the team accepting the swap option pick isnt on board with the conditional deal, can turn into a buyer bewareofftheheezy wrote:This was my impression too, the swap stays the same but you can trade your end of the swap in a separate deal but it doesn’t affect the original team you swapped with. But wanted to confirmvincent1469 wrote:The way I see it is:
If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Questions Thread
Not targeting any trades since I saw multiple instances of this being ok, but is the rule listed here: https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=17264 where no more than 2 FA fillers can be used in a trade actually a rule / enforced?
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Questions Thread
That seems like a vestigial rule, if you have the room (cap and roster spots) why should it matter?offtheheezy wrote:Not targeting any trades since I saw multiple instances of this being ok, but is the rule listed here: https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=17264 where no more than 2 FA fillers can be used in a trade actually a rule / enforced?
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Questions Thread
What I assumed, just wanted to check bc I was curious hahaZyme wrote:That seems like a vestigial rule, if you have the room (cap and roster spots) why should it matter?offtheheezy wrote:Not targeting any trades since I saw multiple instances of this being ok, but is the rule listed here: https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=17264 where no more than 2 FA fillers can be used in a trade actually a rule / enforced?