Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
mrpd21
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1156
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:04 am

Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by mrpd21 »

Does anyone have stats for comparative analysis?? Curious what the cumulative penalties are this season. Seems like Oregon has had far more offensive holding penalties called on them compared to our opponents. I know you can make the case for holding nearly every play. This makes some offensive holding calls pretty subjective, which is one big reason this (IMO) SHOULD BE A 5 YARD PENALTY, NOT 10.

Seen some egregious opponent O-Line holds on our Defense go unaccounted for, it seems it would be a very lopsided statistic this year. If anyone knows how to compile the stats I would really appreciate it, I am curious to see the comparison. I think we are all ready to close the door on Pac 12 refs next year.

Thanks
User avatar
Tray Dub
All Pac-12
Posts: 5004
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by Tray Dub »

5 yards for holding is an interesting idea. I think I actually agree with it.
User avatar
QuackininBama
All Pac-12
Posts: 5156
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by QuackininBama »

Tray Dub wrote:5 yards for holding is an interesting idea. I think I actually agree with it.
I've thought this for decades. The 10 yards is excessive considering every single football analyst states without a doubt, "You can call a holding call on every single play".
rsbgduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Roseburg, OR
Contact:

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by rsbgduck »

I’m a fan of the 5yrd holding penalty or having two categories 5yrd and 10yrd for more egregious infractions. The holding penalties that irritate me the most are the ones they call that have zero impact on the play. I also think PI calls should be reviewable upon a coaches challenge.
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4313
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by SuperDuck »

rsbgduck wrote:I’m a fan of the 5yrd holding penalty or having two categories 5yrd and 10yrd for more egregious infractions. The holding penalties that irritate me the most are the ones they call that have zero impact on the play. I also think PI calls should be reviewable upon a coaches challenge.
I'm in favor of this.
John 3:36
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12855
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by woundedknees »

Isn't it nice being able to dream of a world with NO0o PAC12 refs?

Makes you wanna get all tingly at the possibitlities...

Until you consider that the B1G has already high grad... er, hired away multiple PAC12 refs to supplement their current roster.

Hope they are receiving a boat load of remedial training!
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
TheDrake
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:46 am

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by TheDrake »

Prediction: There will be plenty of bitching about Big Ten refs too!
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35861
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Offensive Holding against vs. In favor of Oregon

Post by greenyellow »

Image
Post Reply