1993 Draft Discussion

All Draft related information will be here

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
User avatar
Cellar-door
Senior
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
GM: Charlotte Hornets

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by Cellar-door »

jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
Hornets GM
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
For sure. Deep point guard class this year.
Marzeial
Freshman
Posts: 1420
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:19 pm
GM: Atlanta Hawks

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by Marzeial »

Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
User avatar
The Bean Regime
Senior
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by The Bean Regime »

Oh dang that Rockets pick woulda gone from 18 to 29!

Thanks TK! lmao
DrBradBuss
Junior
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:56 pm
GM: Detroit Pistons GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by DrBradBuss »

jibbajabba614 wrote:
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
Great news as usual on my draft picks
Houston was the other guy I was deciding upon at 7.
But with Mashburn and Sprewell, didn't think I should go Houston. It's actually why I was a bit upset I didn't get Bradley at 3. I felt like Houston had a chance to be there at 7.
Maybe it will work out in the end.
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

DrBradBuss wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
Great news as usual on my draft picks
Houston was the other guy I was deciding upon at 7.
But with Mashburn and Sprewell, didn't think I should go Houston. It's actually why I was a bit upset I didn't get Bradley at 3. I felt like Houston had a chance to be there at 7.
Maybe it will work out in the end.
Honestly, I like Bradley and Mashburn equally. I probably would have taken Baker because of needs. But between the two the way they simmed, Bradley will get 10ppg/10rpg maybe 4pg if he reaches his potential. Mashburn is easily a 15ppg player and can be a 24ppg type of guy. Even if he doesn’t reach his potential I can see him winning defensive awards because SF is a weak position at the moment
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5399
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by Zyme »

jibbajabba614 wrote:
Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
For old time's sake I wanted Ghiță in the worst way.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
User avatar
jibbajabba614
Senior
Posts: 2410
Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by jibbajabba614 »

Zyme wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
For old time's sake I wanted Ghiță in the worst way.
And FBB favors centers over all positions. Reason I gave him a shot at 1.0 Muresan
User avatar
800wins
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 368
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:12 am

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by 800wins »

Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
User avatar
The Bean Regime
Senior
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by The Bean Regime »

800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37774
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by UOducksTK1 »

The Bean Regime wrote:
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
So first he cheats, then he steals? smh indeed...

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by offtheheezy »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
So first he cheats, then he steals? smh indeed...
Was actually drafted by the Mavs...just lucked out in TC after he gave MJ the rookie extension max for 3 years.
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Post by Oregon Ownage »

offtheheezy wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
So first he cheats, then he steals? smh indeed...
Was actually drafted by the Mavs...just lucked out in TC after he gave MJ the rookie extension max for 3 years.
Yea I didnt offer as much in FA as I thought he was done growing
Image
Post Reply