Page 3 of 4

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:14 pm
by jibbajabba614
Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:27 pm
by Cellar-door
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:30 pm
by jibbajabba614
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
For sure. Deep point guard class this year.

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:35 pm
by Marzeial
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:45 pm
by jibbajabba614
Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 5:37 pm
by The Bean Regime
Oh dang that Rockets pick woulda gone from 18 to 29!

Thanks TK! lmao

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 9:21 pm
by DrBradBuss
jibbajabba614 wrote:
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
Great news as usual on my draft picks
Houston was the other guy I was deciding upon at 7.
But with Mashburn and Sprewell, didn't think I should go Houston. It's actually why I was a bit upset I didn't get Bradley at 3. I felt like Houston had a chance to be there at 7.
Maybe it will work out in the end.

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:07 pm
by jibbajabba614
DrBradBuss wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
Great news as usual on my draft picks
Houston was the other guy I was deciding upon at 7.
But with Mashburn and Sprewell, didn't think I should go Houston. It's actually why I was a bit upset I didn't get Bradley at 3. I felt like Houston had a chance to be there at 7.
Maybe it will work out in the end.
Honestly, I like Bradley and Mashburn equally. I probably would have taken Baker because of needs. But between the two the way they simmed, Bradley will get 10ppg/10rpg maybe 4pg if he reaches his potential. Mashburn is easily a 15ppg player and can be a 24ppg type of guy. Even if he doesn’t reach his potential I can see him winning defensive awards because SF is a weak position at the moment

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:08 pm
by Zyme
jibbajabba614 wrote:
Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
For old time's sake I wanted Ghiță in the worst way.

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:12 pm
by jibbajabba614
Zyme wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
Marzeial wrote:
Cellar-door wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:Had Allan Houston at 6…

Surprised he fell.

Rodney Rogers is also a interesting pick. Love the fact he was allowed to play SG. Not a top prospect but still good ratings. Will be interesting to see what kind of player he can become
I almost pulled the trigger on Houston, but I have so may guys already who are best at SG and still kinda need a PG, so I rolled the dice
I didn't think Houston would make it to me early on but I figured someone would need another PG and I was thinking once the board started to break between him and Big George, one of the two would likely make it
Yeah. I like Muresan but the 3 C+ and A potential are the prison sentences. I don’t think he will be useful at PF because of his quickness. So if he doesn’t develop your left with a 15-20 mpg player.

Yeah we got a lot of guys that have the potential but I put more ready players to compensate that
For old time's sake I wanted Ghiță in the worst way.
And FBB favors centers over all positions. Reason I gave him a shot at 1.0 Muresan

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:02 pm
by 800wins
Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:03 pm
by The Bean Regime
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:05 pm
by UOducksTK1
The Bean Regime wrote:
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
So first he cheats, then he steals? smh indeed...

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:07 pm
by offtheheezy
UOducksTK1 wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
So first he cheats, then he steals? smh indeed...
Was actually drafted by the Mavs...just lucked out in TC after he gave MJ the rookie extension max for 3 years.

Re: 1993 Draft Discussion

Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:21 pm
by Oregon Ownage
offtheheezy wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
The Bean Regime wrote:
800wins wrote:Even looking back @ previous classes, I love the fact that steals can actually be found in late 1sts/2nd.
Biggest 2nd round steal was Mitchell Jordan on the Nets. Smh.
So first he cheats, then he steals? smh indeed...
Was actually drafted by the Mavs...just lucked out in TC after he gave MJ the rookie extension max for 3 years.
Yea I didnt offer as much in FA as I thought he was done growing