Re: Backup PG eligibility
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2023 7:24 pm
AgreedCraig wrote:Giving existing guys PG eligibility totally defeats the purpose lol
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/
AgreedCraig wrote:Giving existing guys PG eligibility totally defeats the purpose lol
My counterpoint is that it's fun. No real reason other than I like seeing Stephen Jackson dominate at backup PG. It's backup. 10 minutes per game max. It isn't going to break the leagueOregon Ownage wrote:I want to hear why people are against it and also some people didnt votebellsduck wrote:We already voted, why more discussion? No one will change their mind in this.
In leagues where I've seen this enforced, yes. It becomes tricky post trade deadline with teams unable to sign a rookie minthe goat wrote:Question: what happens if a team near the cap does not have enough cap space to sign a backup PG? Are they forced to trade for.another PG?
Seems like there's some potential for nefariousnessZyme wrote:In leagues where I've seen this enforced, yes. It becomes tricky post trade deadline with teams unable to sign a rookie minthe goat wrote:Question: what happens if a team near the cap does not have enough cap space to sign a backup PG? Are they forced to trade for.another PG?
I mean im in control of that and is easily preventablethe goat wrote:Seems like there's some potential for nefariousnessZyme wrote:In leagues where I've seen this enforced, yes. It becomes tricky post trade deadline with teams unable to sign a rookie minthe goat wrote:Question: what happens if a team near the cap does not have enough cap space to sign a backup PG? Are they forced to trade for.another PG?
Somebody could "accidentally" trade away their backup PG before the trade deadline and get to play a better backup for the playoffs