Page 4 of 5

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 7:43 am
by jibbajabba614
bellsduck wrote:
jibbajabba614 wrote:
offtheheezy wrote:
vincent1469 wrote:Ngl was expecting Rice to go number 1
Why Glen Rice? I thought it was between Hardaway and Kemp. Guess that shows this class really could've gone anywhere :P
I thought either Pervis or Kemp would get it. I think they could of gotten Hardaway and a future asset at 2 or 3
I think Kemp didn't go cause he had Malone. Didn't Kemp sort of suck in 1.0? Maybe that had something to do with it too.
I would of put something with alcoholism in his notes but seem disrespectful…

Shawn Kemp on Sonics was a beast. Can’t wait for Seattle to get new team. Richmond Bobcats, I’m hoping for second team. But Spiders is such a bad ass name

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am
by lukeyrid13
Hawks out of time?

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:29 am
by DrBradBuss
I think they have until 3pm est

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:39 pm
by lukeyrid13
I'd say Hawks will be skipped until they log in and make their pick at this point. Kings would be on the clock.

That is what I would do if still in charge of the draft at least. They've had ample time to make a selection

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:39 pm
by UOducksTK1
I vote we skip the Hawks pick too. And other GMs continue picking until he logs in and says he's here. Then we can suspend again for him to pick.

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:44 pm
by Cellar-door
Just gotta wait for jibbajabba to get online and make the auto pick unfortunately. Just bad luck that both he and Ownage have been offline.

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:45 pm
by UOducksTK1
I hate auto picks personally. You basically reward a GM for not being responsible and following the rules.

I like the idea of skipping them until they are back. That way they can still get someone they want, and you don't accidentally reward them for being skipped. We need a rule decision on this though!

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:50 pm
by lukeyrid13
UOducksTK1 wrote:I hate auto picks personally. You basically reward a GM for not being responsible and following the rules.

I like the idea of skipping them until they are back. That way they can still get someone they want, and you don't accidentally reward them for being skipped. We need a rule decision on this though!
Let's make a poll!

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:51 pm
by lukeyrid13
When I did the draft, I selected the 2nd or 3rd best player available and at a position of need for the team being simmed

That way they weren't rewarded per se, but also weren't stuck with a 6th point guard or something like that

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:29 pm
by jibbajabba614
Sorry guys been dealing with eye infection today…

I sent TK a draft list for next few picks…

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:45 pm
by UOducksTK1
jibbajabba614 wrote:Sorry guys been dealing with eye infection today…

I sent TK a draft list for next few picks…
Got it

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:36 pm
by UOducksTK1
Hawks didn’t send a list? Meh

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 4:19 pm
by offtheheezy
Will pick soon, Bucks sniped me :(

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:07 pm
by jibbajabba614
offtheheezy wrote:Will pick soon, Bucks sniped me :(
BPA

Re: 1989 Draft Discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2021 6:17 pm
by Oregon Ownage
Files are being updated to pick 30

I will sim the 2nd round tomorrow night

Send in lists