Bowl Results (Final)
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Bowl Results (Final)
BIG 12 (6-1)
Loses to: Big East
Wins against: PAC-12 (3), BIG 10 (2), ACC
SEC (6-3)
Loses to: BIG 10 , Big East, SEC
Wins against: BIG 10 (2), ACC (2), BIG 12, SEC
Conference USA (4-1)
Loses to: Independent
Wins against: BIG 10, WAC, Sun Belt, Big East
MAC (4-1)
Losses to: BIG 10
Wins against: MWC (2), WAC, Sun Belt
BIG 10 (4-6)
Loses to: PAC-12, SEC (2), C-USA , BIG 12 (2)
Wins against: SEC, PAC-12, MAC, ACC
Big East (3-2)
Loses to: ACC, C-USA
Wins against: SEC, BIG 12, ACC
MWC (2-3)
Loses to: MAC (2), Sun Belt
Wins against: PAC-12, WAC
PAC 12 (2-5)
Loses to: BIG 12 (3), BIG 10, MWC
Wins against: BIG 10, ACC
ACC (2-6)
Loses to: SEC (2), PAC-12, BIG 12, BIG 10, BIG EAST
Wins against: Independents, Big East
Independents (1-1)
Loses to: ACC
Wins against: C-USA
Sun Belt (1-2)
Loses to: C-USA, MAC
Wins against: MWC
WAC (0-3)
Loses to: C-USA, MWC, MAC
Wins against:
Loses to: Big East
Wins against: PAC-12 (3), BIG 10 (2), ACC
SEC (6-3)
Loses to: BIG 10 , Big East, SEC
Wins against: BIG 10 (2), ACC (2), BIG 12, SEC
Conference USA (4-1)
Loses to: Independent
Wins against: BIG 10, WAC, Sun Belt, Big East
MAC (4-1)
Losses to: BIG 10
Wins against: MWC (2), WAC, Sun Belt
BIG 10 (4-6)
Loses to: PAC-12, SEC (2), C-USA , BIG 12 (2)
Wins against: SEC, PAC-12, MAC, ACC
Big East (3-2)
Loses to: ACC, C-USA
Wins against: SEC, BIG 12, ACC
MWC (2-3)
Loses to: MAC (2), Sun Belt
Wins against: PAC-12, WAC
PAC 12 (2-5)
Loses to: BIG 12 (3), BIG 10, MWC
Wins against: BIG 10, ACC
ACC (2-6)
Loses to: SEC (2), PAC-12, BIG 12, BIG 10, BIG EAST
Wins against: Independents, Big East
Independents (1-1)
Loses to: ACC
Wins against: C-USA
Sun Belt (1-2)
Loses to: C-USA, MAC
Wins against: MWC
WAC (0-3)
Loses to: C-USA, MWC, MAC
Wins against:
Last edited by Bud Lee on Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:55 am, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2833
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Bowl Results
I don't care. I only root for other teams in the conference to bolster our BCS ratings. Now that we're in bowl season I couldn't care less as long as we win ours.
-
- All-American
- Posts: 12855
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm
Re: Bowl Results
Tedford's boys were an embarrassment... And I don't mean, "of riches".
I couldn't believe they were discussing how well Maynard managed games earlier in the season at the same time he was diving to the ground in the last 2 minutes of the game, instead of trying for the sideline, to stop the clock.
That PF on the Kal DT, when the team had just stopped the long pass play late in the game, was classic.
I couldn't believe they were discussing how well Maynard managed games earlier in the season at the same time he was diving to the ground in the last 2 minutes of the game, instead of trying for the sideline, to stop the clock.
That PF on the Kal DT, when the team had just stopped the long pass play late in the game, was classic.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Bowl Results
Pac-12 is terrible, no shock this year. Stanford, USC, and Oregon are the only good teams. And USC isn't even in any bowls, so that sucks.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Bowl Results
...and Stanford has the worst matchup possible for them.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Bowl Results
Oregon's the Pac-12's only hope.lukeyrid13 wrote:...and Stanford has the worst matchup possible for them.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- nehalem
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:15 pm
Re: Bowl Results
Obi wan to yoda-no, their's another.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2833
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
Re: Bowl Results
nehalem wrote:Obi wan to yoda-no, their's another.
- Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: Bowl Results
Really is a BAD year for y’all. Hopefully things will start to turn around next year.UOducksTK1 wrote:Pac-12 is terrible, no shock this year. Stanford, USC, and Oregon are the only good teams. And USC isn't even in any bowls, so that sucks.
- Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: Bowl Results (Final)
Soooo……the Big 12 absolutely owned the PAC and the Big 10. The SEC had a respectful showing beating teams from the Big 12, Big 10, ACC, and securing another Natty (which ironically ends our undefeated streak at 9-1). C-USA was probably the biggest surprised beating two BCS conferences and going 4-1. The MAC looked impressive against mediocre opponents. The Big 10 sucked it. The Big East did a lot better than I expected. The MWC did well. The PAC got their asses handed to them along with the ACC. The indes split their 2 and the Sun Belt did slightly better that the WAC seeing that they won 1 of their three as the WAC is the only conference to get end the bowl season without a win.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 15962
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Bowl Results (Final)
Meh. If USC wasn't punished so severely (and unjustly according to tOSU sanctions) they would have played in either the Alamo or Fiesta. Even if SC plays the Alamo, they beat Baylor, Washington beats Texas and suddenly that porous showing doesn't look so bad.Bud Lee wrote:Soooo……the Big 12 absolutely owned the PAC and the Big 10. The SEC had a respectful showing beating teams from the Big 12, Big 10, ACC, and securing another Natty (which ironically ends our undefeated streak at 9-1). C-USA was probably the biggest surprised beating two BCS conferences and going 4-1. The MAC looked impressive against mediocre opponents. The Big 10 sucked it. The Big East did a lot better than I expected. The MWC did well. The PAC got their asses handed to them along with the ACC. The indes split their 2 and the Sun Belt did slightly better that the WAC seeing that they won 1 of their three as the WAC is the only conference to get end the bowl season without a win.
- Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: Bowl Results (Final)
Well.....you mean they might of beating Baylor….and assuming Washington gets Texas they might of been able to do what Cal could not....BUT....both could of gone and the results could of remained the same.Meh. If USC wasn't punished so severely (and unjustly according to tOSU sanctions) they would have played in either the Alamo or Fiesta. Even if SC plays the Alamo, they beat Baylor, Washington beats Texas and suddenly that porous showing doesn't look so bad.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 15962
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Bowl Results (Final)
Sorry, not impressed by either Baylor or Texas, not that I was impressed with UW but in a game against UT, I'm sorry, the poodles would have destroyed Manny Diaz' defense, especially considering just how inept that UT O is. Hey, maybe they can expect another 5* RB to be their savior again though.Bud Lee wrote:Well.....you mean they might of beating Baylor….and assuming Washington gets Texas they might of been able to do what Cal could not....BUT....both could of gone and the results could of remained the same.Meh. If USC wasn't punished so severely (and unjustly according to tOSU sanctions) they would have played in either the Alamo or Fiesta. Even if SC plays the Alamo, they beat Baylor, Washington beats Texas and suddenly that porous showing doesn't look so bad.