Lane is a liar

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:53 pm

http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blog ... 2&id=42531

Do not mess with the USA Today Coaches Poll because it is not afraid to narc on you.

USC coach Lane Kiffin stepped in it Tuesday when he told reporters he wouldn't vote the Trojans No. 1. That wasn't a smart thing to say, most particularly because he did vote USC No. 1 with his first-ever vote in the coaches' poll.

dd10snoop28 · Post by **dd10snoop28** » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 pm

I can't believe I allowed myself to actually think that he has changed since UT and his first couple years at USC. Some people never change.

Post by **dthomas=ddixon** » Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm

I don't think Lane is a terrible guy, he just can't seem to get rid of the immature dbag shtick.

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:44 pm

uodux1212 wrote:http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blog ... 2&id=42531

Do not mess with the USA Today Coaches Poll because it is not afraid to narc on you.

USC coach Lane Kiffin stepped in it Tuesday when he told reporters he wouldn't vote the Trojans No. 1. That wasn't a smart thing to say, most particularly because he did vote USC No. 1 with his first-ever vote in the coaches' poll.

Not a lie, sadly. His sports information director voted SC #1.

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:44 pm

Duck07 wrote:
uodux1212 wrote:http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blog ... 2&id=42531

Do not mess with the USA Today Coaches Poll because it is not afraid to narc on you.

USC coach Lane Kiffin stepped in it Tuesday when he told reporters he wouldn't vote the Trojans No. 1. That wasn't a smart thing to say, most particularly because he did vote USC No. 1 with his first-ever vote in the coaches' poll.
Not a lie, sadly. His sports information director voted SC #1.

He said he filled it out himself with the help of a few others.....

Braveheart · Post by **Braveheart** » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:18 pm

Either way....

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:34 pm

I'm glad he's back in the P12... Makes things interesting if nothing else.

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:04 pm

He said he wouldn't vote them number one if he were coach of a different team. Meaning, looking at us from the outside, I sure wouldn't think USC was number one.

Sent from my iPad

maxduck · Post by **maxduck** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:20 am

And now...

Lane Kiffin, a voting member for this season's USA Today college football coaches' poll for the first time, says he has pulled out -- after one vote for the preseason standings -- and won't continue to submit selections.

http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/stor ... aches-poll

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:20 am

Spin.

Either way he gave up his vote.

http://m.espn.go.com/ncf/story?storyId=8263986

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:27 am

maxduck wrote:And now...

Lane Kiffin, a voting member for this season's USA Today college football coaches' poll for the first time, says he has pulled out -- after one vote for the preseason standings -- and won't continue to submit selections.

http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/stor ... aches-poll

Id do the same. Even if he lied, they shouldn't have exposed him. They say it is for the integrity of the poll, but integrity would be to be able to vote anonymously so you don't have to play politics with your vote

Posted from my Android

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:34 am

But if they feel like a coach is using their system to improve his team than I think that call upon that coach's integrity. I know it's a little different than a terrible team having a random #1 vote whereas most have USC at about #3 at worst but still you shouldn't be voting them #1 if you don't think they're the best team

USUaggieDuck · Post by **USUaggieDuck** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:34 pm

lukeyrid13 wrote:But if they feel like a coach is using their system to improve his team than I think that call upon that coach's integrity. I know it's a little different than a terrible team having a random #1 vote whereas most have USC at about #3 at worst but still you shouldn't be voting them #1 if you don't think they're the best team

I think he does think they are the best. I think his initial comment was misconstrued. He's kind of awkward around words, but this shouldn't have been a big deal.

Sent from my iPad

Boom · Post by **Boom** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 3:23 pm

USUaggieDuck wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:But if they feel like a coach is using their system to improve his team than I think that call upon that coach's integrity. I know it's a little different than a terrible team having a random #1 vote whereas most have USC at about #3 at worst but still you shouldn't be voting them #1 if you don't think they're the best team
I think he does think they are the best. I think his initial comment was misconstrued. He's kind of awkward around words, but this shouldn't have been a big deal.

Sent from my iPad

That's putting it politely

buckmarkduck · Post by **buckmarkduck** » Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:44 pm

This is honestly the most non story I have read in a long time. Not sure why it seems to be such big news, unless you just want to knit pick things to hate SC over. It's like UW hating UO for having 12-0 shirts, having to many uniforms, making the swoosh to bright on Seahawks unis, playing the pick to much and on and on.

Lane is a liar

Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar

Re: Lane is a liar