Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35849
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by greenyellow »

Oregon has updated their roster to include Castille and remove Feliciano. Looking at it shows how thin the Ducks are up front. It could get even thinner if the rumors of Bell not being cleared and the coaches actively looking for a prep school to place him in are true. I could easily see Oregon going to some 4 guard line-ups with their backcourt depth.

http://www.goducks.com/SportSelect.dbml ... D=4295&KEY
Image
User avatar
frogsnouts
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 398
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:41 pm

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by frogsnouts »

If Bell is out and Young doesn't get in this year...we might be in a ton of trouble this year and lucky to make the NIT.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37690
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by UOducksTK1 »

greenyellow wrote:Oregon has updated their roster to include Castille and remove Feliciano. Looking at it shows how thin the Ducks are up front. It could get even thinner if the rumors of Bell not being cleared and the coaches actively looking for a prep school to place him in are true. I could easily see Oregon going to some 4 guard line-ups with their backcourt depth.

http://www.goducks.com/SportSelect.dbml ... D=4295&KEY
Yeah we need Bell's athleticism and shot blocking. Hope he qualifies.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35849
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by greenyellow »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
greenyellow wrote:Oregon has updated their roster to include Castille and remove Feliciano. Looking at it shows how thin the Ducks are up front. It could get even thinner if the rumors of Bell not being cleared and the coaches actively looking for a prep school to place him in are true. I could easily see Oregon going to some 4 guard line-ups with their backcourt depth.

http://www.goducks.com/SportSelect.dbml ... D=4295&KEY
Yeah we need Bell's athleticism and shot blocking. Hope he qualifies.
I was checking the UO's student directory and was able to find all but Bell, Castille and Moser in there. I think Moser and Castille are sure bets to get in but with Bell not being there, I think there may be some legs to this rumor. Oregon's prospects this season could go down another peg without Bell providing some depth this year and contributing even more his SO year. It'd mean Altman only got 1 of his FR recruits and he'd have to seriously make up for it in the 2014 class, which he's already having to do.
Image
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by oregontrack »

you guys are vastly overestimating the projected contributions of some of these guys this year. neither that braziliian kid or bell coming here or not really moves oregon in one direction or the other. impacts future seasons, sure. but if we're slapped with injuries to the point we're needing to rely on 3rd string true freshmen big men, we're already f*******. take a look around the pac-12 and tell me how many teams have six capable big men they'd be comfortable going with. everyone has 3-4. we have 4. oh noes!!
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5674
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by Boom »

Great.. If Bell doesn't qualify then this is another wasted recruiting class.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5674
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by Boom »

oregontrack wrote:you guys are vastly overestimating the projected contributions of some of these guys this year. neither that braziliian kid or bell coming here or not really moves oregon in one direction or the other. impacts future seasons, sure. but if we're slapped with injuries to the point we're needing to rely on 3rd string true freshmen big men, we're already f*******. take a look around the pac-12 and tell me how many teams have six capable big men they'd be comfortable going with. everyone has 3-4. we have 4. oh noes!!
That's highly debatable.

Moser is a tweener and he's the only one that's starter worthy (If healthy). Ben Carter showed that he could be a decent backup. Waverly Austin is a very frustrating player to watch... and the 4th is a football player... or am I missing someone?
cordy02c
Senior
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by cordy02c »

The jc guy Amardi is the 4th
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by oregontrack »

if you think moser is a tweener then i can see where you're coming from.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5674
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by Boom »

I'm actually more concerned for the next few seasons... Bell & Feliciano at least gave you hope that they could have developed well under our coaching staff and help lead the team to a solid tourney run before Artis & Dotson graduate.

Now it looks like we have to reload with JC players again and hopefully get lucky with another stud transfer or two next season.
bfrees23
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:31 am

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by bfrees23 »

he's on there now
bfrees23
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:31 am

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by bfrees23 »

he's on there now
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37690
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by UOducksTK1 »

bfrees23 wrote:he's on there now
Good.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8214
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

bfrees23 wrote:he's on there now
Whew! That would have been a big blow. We need to start getting some sort of structure with our recruiting classes. I love bringing in transfers that help the team but I do not like the idea of having to depend on them.
Image
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4900
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Updated roster/Bell not qualified?

Post by pudgejeff »

bfrees23 wrote:he's on there now
On where?
Post Reply