If Heezy and Pistol both send 400 PMs though do we just make all their players 99 ratingsUOducksTK1 wrote:or we give +3 to Gms who respond to PMs
Questions Thread
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Questions Thread
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
Re: Questions Thread
You get a +1 and you get a +1lukeyrid13 wrote:If Heezy and Pistol both send 400 PMs though do we just make all their players 99 ratingsUOducksTK1 wrote:or we give +3 to Gms who respond to PMs
---
PistolPeteJR
PistolPeteJR
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Questions Thread
Gotta hustle to winlukeyrid13 wrote:If Heezy and Pistol both send 400 PMs though do we just make all their players 99 ratingsUOducksTK1 wrote:or we give +3 to Gms who respond to PMs
- Foxyg1396
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:27 pm
- GM: Denver Nuggets
Re: Questions Thread
1 per season? Also, how would we track that league widelukeyrid13 wrote:If Heezy and Pistol both send 400 PMs though do we just make all their players 99 ratingsUOducksTK1 wrote:or we give +3 to Gms who respond to PMs
- Goose!
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:48 pm
Re: Questions Thread
What advantage is there to moving a player to a position (ex. PF to SF) as opposed to playing the PF at the SF position?
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Questions Thread
Defense could changeGoose! wrote:What advantage is there to moving a player to a position (ex. PF to SF) as opposed to playing the PF at the SF position?
There are negatives to position changes.
For example, if Scottie Pippen was SG eligible and you officially changed him to SG I believe the game caps SG rebounding at like 65 so keeping his official position as SF but playing him at SG would be better
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: Questions Thread
Their defensive rating is "re-calculated" with the position change, since the ratings of different attributes are weighted differently for defense at each listed position (e.g., post defense/shot blocking is not nearly as relevant for perimeter positions).Goose! wrote:What advantage is there to moving a player to a position (ex. PF to SF) as opposed to playing the PF at the SF position?
SUNS GM
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: Questions Thread
Moving a guy positions also impacts how the game pulls off your bench for injuries and foul trouble I believe, since it uses positions in determining who to sub if it's going off the depth chart.
Hornets GM
- Goose!
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:48 pm
Re: Questions Thread
Thanks. Is this stuff documented anywhere?
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Questions Thread
There are also hard caps to a few stats based on position. Increasing handling caps as you move from C to PG and rebounding caps for PG and SG(less with SG). There are no caps for SF as far as im aware. I believe you could have a maxed out player in all categories at SF, this is not true for any other position.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Questions Thread
^ If you move a SF to SG and then back again can't it hold his ratings at the SG spot?
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Questions Thread
If you for example moved scottie pippen from SF to SG, it would likely lower his rebounding numbers as part of the move. Unless manually corrected, they are not restored if moved back. There are the fewest caps overall (not sure if any) for the SF position.lukeyrid13 wrote:^ If you move a SF to SG and then back again can't it hold his ratings at the SG spot?
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Questions Thread
The main way that this impacts the gameplay is for players like Jason Kidd who are rebounders from the PG position, The game engine makes their rebounding number inherently lower. Kidd and Magic should be SG or even SF (in the case of magic) who are PG eligible. If you do not you will run into the issues of capping off their rebounding.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Questions Thread
^ what about if magic is played as super sub and plays SF? You think it’s still better if he’s listed as SF?
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: Questions Thread
The critical phase is during development years. Once hes full grown 4-5 yrs in it really doesn't matter so long as you don't move a SF down to SG or a PG elli SF/SG to PG.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)