Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
What a screw-off. Helfrich needs to nip that kind of behavior in the bud.Duck07 wrote:He was throwing left-handed on the sideline. I think that might say it all, lolgreenyellow wrote:I bet we see Lockie here now. I think Mariota has done enough to sit out the rest of the game.
To keep the ball in front of them.rockthief wrote:why DBs playing so soft?
Wyoming is not a bad team. Sound fundamentals and some good players, good coach. Bet they would give a lot of Pac 12 teams fits. Bet they go on to have a pretty good year.gofightingducks wrote:Not that it matters but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Ducks drop in the AP Poll and lose some first place votes. Poor defensive performance, the score doesn't give justice to how well Wyoming's office has played.
We say the same thing every week: "Oh the game was much closer than the score would indicate." At some point, we need to recognize that part of the ducks' strategy is 'bend but don't break' and 'score in bunches'. It's been that way for a number of years now.gofightingducks wrote:Not that it matters but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Ducks drop in the AP Poll and lose some first place votes. Poor defensive performance, the score doesn't give justice to how well Wyoming's office has played.
Your selling Bohl and Wyoming short. Anyone who knows anything about college football knew Wyoming was going to play well. They are well coached, disciplined, and motivated. That is the staple of a Bohl coached team.gofightingducks wrote:Not that it matters but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Ducks drop in the AP Poll and lose some first place votes. Poor defensive performance, the score doesn't give justice to how well Wyoming's office has played.
^Exactly. The fact Oregon has done so well against them is more a testament to how good Oregon is.QuackininBama wrote:Your selling Bohl and Wyoming short. Anyone who knows anything about college football knew Wyoming was going to play well. They are well coached, disciplined, and motivated. That is the staple of a Bohl coached team.gofightingducks wrote:Not that it matters but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Ducks drop in the AP Poll and lose some first place votes. Poor defensive performance, the score doesn't give justice to how well Wyoming's office has played.
Good to see Oregon getting some backups some run and a TD.woundedknees wrote:3rd and goal... TD Benoit!
Yea, Brenner needs the reps at C and I'm glad to see Pisarcik still at RG as he needs all the reps he can get as an emerging young G. Also, we're seeing Hunt transition to RT now and with Pisarcik playing so well it fortunately allows us to get him more time outside. I couldn't see who was on the left side and if Matt Pierson is still in or not, I'd have to believe so.greenyellow wrote:Good to see Oregon getting some backups some run and a TD.woundedknees wrote:3rd and goal... TD Benoit!
QuackininBama wrote:Your selling Bohl and Wyoming short. Anyone who knows anything about college football knew Wyoming was going to play well. They are well coached, disciplined, and motivated. That is the staple of a Bohl coached team.gofightingducks wrote:Not that it matters but I wouldn't be surprised to see the Ducks drop in the AP Poll and lose some first place votes. Poor defensive performance, the score doesn't give justice to how well Wyoming's office has played.
