I say as along as it's during the normal MLE extension time then yes they should be able toOregon Ownage wrote:Can a GM remove an MLE extension on a player that another team put in place before the season starts?
I see both sides of this argument but want to hear what others have to say about it.
Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- dennocj
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:32 pm
- GM: Indiana Pacers
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
- pudgejeff
- Senior
- Posts: 4900
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
I agree it's a complete dick move. It's the Spurs fault for extending and should have to deal with having to trade a non-expiring. In this specific situation I think it should up to the Hawks if they would like to cancel the trade or take on the contract.Craig wrote:It's kind of a dick move not to say anything lol.
As a suggestion, if the deadline is Sim 2, then don't process anything until that point. The implication being that GMs can change their minds if they want (or a receiving GM can cancel it) any time before that deadline.
As for this situation, they're both guilty of not paying attention lol. I don't have a good reason for it, but I say just cut him down to expiring for Hawks
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Well in that case, I'd probably cut it down to an expiring just this once.Oregon Ownage wrote:For reference, the files were not updated with MLE extensions until preseason
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Moving forward, you have up until sim 2 to edit your extension. After that, it is locked in.
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Waiver system or continue a previous(first to claim)?
I like the waiver system to remove luck (being the first to claim) when a player is cut. If a player pass through waivers without being claimed then it is business as usual. If you do claim, you inherent the players salary on the previous team. (Can't claim if it puts you over)
Team with the worst record would then be awarded the player.
I like the waiver system to remove luck (being the first to claim) when a player is cut. If a player pass through waivers without being claimed then it is business as usual. If you do claim, you inherent the players salary on the previous team. (Can't claim if it puts you over)
Team with the worst record would then be awarded the player.
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
You need to be under soft cap for waiver claims, no?
SUNS GM
- pudgejeff
- Senior
- Posts: 4900
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Doesn't sound like it.Craig wrote:You need to be under soft cap for waiver claims, no?
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:19 pm
- GM: Atlanta Hawks
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
I really like the waivers idea. Like they have a day or two to pass through. Especially since this is a more casual league and everyone isn't on every hour it allows everyone a chance to put in a claim
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
No you do not have to be under the soft cap to put in a claim.pudgejeff wrote:Doesn't sound like it.Craig wrote:You need to be under soft cap for waiver claims, no?
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Case in point this year, no one would be able to put a claim inOregon Ownage wrote:No you do not have to be under the soft cap to put in a claim.pudgejeff wrote:Doesn't sound like it.Craig wrote:You need to be under soft cap for waiver claims, no?
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
I was thinking 24 hours or 1 sim. Most of the time it is the same but for days I dont sim, I can still award a claim.Marzeial wrote:I really like the waivers idea. Like they have a day or two to pass through. Especially since this is a more casual league and everyone isn't on every hour it allows everyone a chance to put in a claim
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
Business as usual meaning a typical cut?
Also, will the team be able to ask for anything on the waiver? If it's only straight waivers and your prize is potentially getting rid of a contract, then I support it. I don't like waiver systems where a waiving team can ask for or give things with the player. Also don't like the "can only claim player x if you also claim player y" thing.
ALSOOOOOOO, I propose if it is implemented, to only allow waivers between days 1-99 (as to say, none past the trade deadline, playoffs, or offseason).
Also, will the team be able to ask for anything on the waiver? If it's only straight waivers and your prize is potentially getting rid of a contract, then I support it. I don't like waiver systems where a waiving team can ask for or give things with the player. Also don't like the "can only claim player x if you also claim player y" thing.
ALSOOOOOOO, I propose if it is implemented, to only allow waivers between days 1-99 (as to say, none past the trade deadline, playoffs, or offseason).
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
YesThe Bean Regime wrote:Business as usual meaning a typical cut?
While you are ridding the contract, you still take the cut loss (I.E, cut a player on a 2.3 mil salary, you are still docked 2.3 mil. It doesnt magically disappear)The Bean Regime wrote:Also, will the team be able to ask for anything on the waiver? If it's only straight waivers and your prize is potentially getting rid of a contract, then I support it. I don't like waiver systems where a waiving team can ask for or give things with the player. Also don't like the "can only claim player x if you also claim player y" thing.
Would work just like a trade deadlineThe Bean Regime wrote:ALSOOOOOOO, I propose if it is implemented, to only allow waivers between days 1-99 (as to say, none past the trade deadline, playoffs, or offseason).
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
ThisThe Bean Regime wrote:Business as usual meaning a typical cut?
Also, will the team be able to ask for anything on the waiver? If it's only straight waivers and your prize is potentially getting rid of a contract, then I support it. I don't like waiver systems where a waiving team can ask for or give things with the player. Also don't like the "can only claim player x if you also claim player y" thing.
ALSOOOOOOO, I propose if it is implemented, to only allow waivers between days 1-99 (as to say, none past the trade deadline, playoffs, or offseason).
SUNS GM
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: Offseason Discussion/League Improvements
so what is the point, then, exactly?Oregon Ownage wrote:YesThe Bean Regime wrote:Business as usual meaning a typical cut?
While you are ridding the contract, you still take the cut loss (I.E, cut a player on a 2.3 mil salary, you are still docked 2.3 mil. It doesnt magically disappear)The Bean Regime wrote:Also, will the team be able to ask for anything on the waiver? If it's only straight waivers and your prize is potentially getting rid of a contract, then I support it. I don't like waiver systems where a waiving team can ask for or give things with the player. Also don't like the "can only claim player x if you also claim player y" thing.
Would work just like a trade deadlineThe Bean Regime wrote:ALSOOOOOOO, I propose if it is implemented, to only allow waivers between days 1-99 (as to say, none past the trade deadline, playoffs, or offseason).
SUNS GM