Page 15 of 26

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:54 pm
by catch 922
Oregon Ownage wrote:
catch 922 wrote:
nray30 wrote:OKC can only play with one ball. Three ball dominant players in the last year of their contract spells disaster. Hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think it will work
Yeah hence my curiosity, its gonna be a weird year. Especially since lebron wont be in the finals
LeBron not in the finals? Your crazy

Still crazy? Celtics look really good, itd be scarier if they had Hayward

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:43 am
by UOducksTK1
Happy thanksgiving everyone, enjoy time with family and friends.

God Bless!

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:50 pm
by FlDuckFan
Love how this part of the forum is so calm while the Duck side is in full meltdown

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:38 pm
by UOducksTK1
FlDuckFan wrote:Love how this part of the forum is so calm while the Duck side is in full meltdown
:lol:

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:41 pm
by Oregon Ownage
FlDuckFan wrote:Love how this part of the forum is so calm while the Duck side is in full meltdown
Image

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:40 pm
by Cellar-door
Anyone else been having a problem with people just outright not replying to PMs sometimes multiple PMs? Seriously, replying to PMs even with a simple, yeah not interested should be considered the bare minimum of league involvement.

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:09 pm
by Briezy
One person in particular, yes. I Messaged asking about a player. He made a post asking for offers on said player. Messaged him again asking what he was looking for. No answer. Messaged again with a specific offer. No answer. Then commented on the post saying I was interested. Still no response.

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:20 pm
by FlDuckFan
Cellar-door wrote:Anyone else been having a problem with people just outright not replying to PMs sometimes multiple PMs? Seriously, replying to PMs even with a simple, yeah not interested should be considered the bare minimum of league involvement.

I've been on both sides of this I usually try my best to answer . Sometimes I'll check it and see an offer and then go to check it out but then get distracted and forget what I was doing

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:19 am
by Zyme
What if we do a bowl pickem for a player upgrade?

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:23 am
by Oregon Ownage
Zyme wrote:What if we do a bowl pickem for a player upgrade?
It crossed my mind. If you are interested in this, reply back

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 12:48 pm
by eddy_zamora
Does there have to be a league-wide focus on an article? I wanted to write a little narrative piece about my 1st season back in the DASL with the Timberwolves but I didn’t want to just post it and have people be like “ok cool”

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 1:33 pm
by Zyme
Nope, nothing requires a league focus we've had one team articles in the past.

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:19 am
by nh333
Oregon Ownage wrote:
Zyme wrote:What if we do a bowl pickem for a player upgrade?
It crossed my mind. If you are interested in this, reply back
I'm in.

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:39 am
by pistolpetejr
Oregon Ownage wrote:
Zyme wrote:What if we do a bowl pickem for a player upgrade?
It crossed my mind. If you are interested in this, reply back
Would this be for college footy ball ? Know nothing about it lol but I guess I can check out a cheat sheet?:P

Re: GM Lounge

Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:40 am
by pistolpetejr
Cellar-door wrote:Anyone else been having a problem with people just outright not replying to PMs sometimes multiple PMs? Seriously, replying to PMs even with a simple, yeah not interested should be considered the bare minimum of league involvement.
One of my biggest pet peeves here. And it’s not just one GM.