NFL Combine 2017
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:01 am
Leonard weighing a little heavy at 240. If he runs fast that is going to be a big plus for him if not
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/
Only a 28.5 in. vertical. lolBud Lee wrote:Leonard weighing a little heavy at 240. If he runs fast that is going to be a big plus for him if not
What was his 10 yard split? I would have expected a better vertical relative to that time.Bud Lee wrote:Leonard hit a 4.51 u , that is really impressive for a 240 frame
Duck07 wrote:What was his 10 yard split? I would have expected a better vertical relative to that time.Bud Lee wrote:Leonard hit a 4.51 u , that is really impressive for a 240 frame
The only one invited was Pharaoh and they haven't worked out yet.Biggus Duckus wrote:What about Ducks, how have they been?
Will be interesting to see if he can do anything in the NFL. He's pretty small. If I'm a GM, I wouldn't draft him before round 3. But I'm always skeptical of little fast dudes.DuckedOut wrote:Well, John Ross just broke the combine 40 record.
Really stinks too, he could've been a Duck.
Crazy talk.ifuwant2 wrote:Will be interesting to see if he can do anything in the NFL. He's pretty small. If I'm a GM, I wouldn't draft him before round 3. But I'm always skeptical of little fast dudes.DuckedOut wrote:Well, John Ross just broke the combine 40 record.
Really stinks too, he could've been a Duck.
Yeah, I always undervalue little dudes. At almost every position. Even fast ones.Phenom wrote:Crazy talk.ifuwant2 wrote:Will be interesting to see if he can do anything in the NFL. He's pretty small. If I'm a GM, I wouldn't draft him before round 3. But I'm always skeptical of little fast dudes.DuckedOut wrote:Well, John Ross just broke the combine 40 record.
Really stinks too, he could've been a Duck.
It's kind of an odd thing for an Oregon fan to do given guys like DAT and LMJ. But everyone's entitled to their opinion.ifuwant2 wrote:Yeah, I always undervalue little dudes. At almost every position. Even fast ones.Phenom wrote:Crazy talk.ifuwant2 wrote:Will be interesting to see if he can do anything in the NFL. He's pretty small. If I'm a GM, I wouldn't draft him before round 3. But I'm always skeptical of little fast dudes.DuckedOut wrote:Well, John Ross just broke the combine 40 record.
Really stinks too, he could've been a Duck.
I was thinking more in line with the NFL in this particular conversation. In college, I believe in little fast dudes. Obviously, you want to get the best ones possible. Sure we've had a couple great ones, but we've had a couple great ones at most positions. So does most any big-time college football team. Neither DAT nor LMJ would have been worth a pick in the top 60 in the NFL. I guess we could maybe go back and look at DAT's draft year and try to decide if there ended up being 60 better players. I think the only case you could make for DAT is your team is already loaded but could use a specialist. But an NFL top 60 pick is a big-money gamble, and little fast dudes tend to have short careers.Tray Dub wrote:It's kind of an odd thing for an Oregon fan to do given guys like DAT and LMJ. But everyone's entitled to their opinion.ifuwant2 wrote:Yeah, I always undervalue little dudes. At almost every position. Even fast ones.Phenom wrote:Crazy talk.ifuwant2 wrote:Will be interesting to see if he can do anything in the NFL. He's pretty small. If I'm a GM, I wouldn't draft him before round 3. But I'm always skeptical of little fast dudes.DuckedOut wrote:Well, John Ross just broke the combine 40 record.
Really stinks too, he could've been a Duck.