Re: Assistant Coaches: Comings and Goings
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:25 pm
I did find it interesting that he has nothing about Wazzu football in his description. And he said, "what cougar football was all about. " Was..past tense.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/
Well you can't really talk about Halinski in the present or future tense anymore so it does make sense the way he worded it.Phenom wrote:I did find it interesting that he has nothing about Wazzu football in his description. And he said, "what cougar football was all about. " Was..past tense.
Isn't he referring to Cougar football, though?greenyellow wrote:Well you can't really talk about Halinski in the present or future tense anymore so it does make sense the way he worded it.Phenom wrote:I did find it interesting that he has nothing about Wazzu football in his description. And he said, "what cougar football was all about. " Was..past tense.
The second "was" referred to being a Cougar, not the late-Tyler. The tense of being a Cougar belongs to the author. So if he's being accurate grammatically then he's no longer a Cougar. But he's just human and could have written in poorly.greenyellow wrote:Well you can't really talk about Halinski in the present or future tense anymore so it does make sense the way he worded it.Phenom wrote:I did find it interesting that he has nothing about Wazzu football in his description. And he said, "what cougar football was all about. " Was..past tense.
I wouldn’t put too much stock into football coaches being grammatically correct and trying to glean insight from what their grammar usage means since most of them are former football players.5$ wrote:The second "was" referred to being a Cougar, not the late-Tyler. The tense of being a Cougar belongs to the author. So if he's being accurate grammatically then he's no longer a Cougar. But he's just human and could have written in poorly.greenyellow wrote:Well you can't really talk about Halinski in the present or future tense anymore so it does make sense the way he worded it.Phenom wrote:I did find it interesting that he has nothing about Wazzu football in his description. And he said, "what cougar football was all about. " Was..past tense.
Especially when we are talking about a young man who just passed away. Grammar is rather inconsequential at that point IMO.Duck24 wrote:I wouldn’t put too much stock into football coaches being grammatically correct and trying to glean insight from what their grammar usage means since most of them are former football players.5$ wrote:The second "was" referred to being a Cougar, not the late-Tyler. The tense of being a Cougar belongs to the author. So if he's being accurate grammatically then he's no longer a Cougar. But he's just human and could have written in poorly.greenyellow wrote:Well you can't really talk about Halinski in the present or future tense anymore so it does make sense the way he worded it.Phenom wrote:I did find it interesting that he has nothing about Wazzu football in his description. And he said, "what cougar football was all about. " Was..past tense.
Madsduck wrote:Looks like Jim Mastro will be the man.
Just got hired as associate head coach/ILBs at Cal. Going back to Wilcox.woundedknees wrote:With Peter Sirmon out at Louisville, I wonder if he gains any interest from the Ducks?
DuckMastaFunk wrote:Madsduck wrote:Looks like Jim Mastro will be the man.
Out of curiosity, where is this info coming from?
Thanks for the info Mads!Madsduck wrote:DuckMastaFunk wrote:Madsduck wrote:Looks like Jim Mastro will be the man.
Out of curiosity, where is this info coming from?
Outside the football program but inside the University.
Jhop seems confidentmaxduck wrote:Saw a rumor that Cort Dennison, Louisville LB coach and recruiting coordinator, may be returning to the Pacific Northwest. Apparently the former Husky is seriously considering joining the Oregon staff. Reportedly another terrific recruiter. Has anybody else heard anything?