Pacers/Bucks

[Craig]

Which means what exactly? That I can't make a point?

If you can’t see the relevance then I’m not sure what to tell you buddy lol

[pistolpetejr]

Which means what exactly? That I can't make a point?

If you can’t see the relevance then I’m not sure what to tell you buddy lol

Let’s go with I missed the relevance.

[jibbajabba614]

Damn, my bad y’all lol. Did not realize this would result in all this and definitely didn’t mean to cause all this. I do this league to haven fun and take my mind of real world stuff for times of the day. I realize I’m not the greatest at playing this game but I really do enjoy it. My thought process on these deals was that I realized Kanter’s contract sucks but I do feel he is a slight upgrade over Bamba right now. I liked the picks as well, one obviously being mine. For the trade with the Bucks, I really just like Jaylen Brown. For short, I just wanted to make a change and try something else out. I’ll roll with whatever ultimate decision is made, which it looks like vetoed, but I appreciate all of yalls thoughts on these trades and I hope y’all have a good Valentine’s Day. I’ve already made it pretty exciting for y’all lol

From my experience of trade talking with Pacers, I got the feeling people would try to get the best out of him. I try to make deals that benefits both teams. I personally think other GM’s should try not to get over on someone just because they can.

Also I get why both trades got veto. This one isn’t veto worthy but the other one is. And the pick causes this one to be void. Bucks can’t get mad about that. Rework a new deal that benefits both teams.

For a GM to have to worry about another team's managing their own squad makes no sense, in my mind. I understand that could sound selfish and self-centred as it pertains to the health of the league, as the aim is to have fun, but the aim is to have fun in the spirit of competition, and in the spirit of competition, GMs are looking to position themselves to win. I personally don't think Pacers GM got fleeced as a number of people are making it sound, but we are working to rework the deal for the sake of the league.

I agree with you but you can’t get upset when a trade gets vetoed or a GM doesn’t respond.

[pistolpetejr]

Damn, my bad y’all lol. Did not realize this would result in all this and definitely didn’t mean to cause all this. I do this league to haven fun and take my mind of real world stuff for times of the day. I realize I’m not the greatest at playing this game but I really do enjoy it. My thought process on these deals was that I realized Kanter’s contract sucks but I do feel he is a slight upgrade over Bamba right now. I liked the picks as well, one obviously being mine. For the trade with the Bucks, I really just like Jaylen Brown. For short, I just wanted to make a change and try something else out. I’ll roll with whatever ultimate decision is made, which it looks like vetoed, but I appreciate all of yalls thoughts on these trades and I hope y’all have a good Valentine’s Day. I’ve already made it pretty exciting for y’all lol

From my experience of trade talking with Pacers, I got the feeling people would try to get the best out of him. I try to make deals that benefits both teams. I personally think other GM’s should try not to get over on someone just because they can.

Also I get why both trades got veto. This one isn’t veto worthy but the other one is. And the pick causes this one to be void. Bucks can’t get mad about that. Rework a new deal that benefits both teams.

For a GM to have to worry about another team's managing their own squad makes no sense, in my mind. I understand that could sound selfish and self-centred as it pertains to the health of the league, as the aim is to have fun, but the aim is to have fun in the spirit of competition, and in the spirit of competition, GMs are looking to position themselves to win. I personally don't think Pacers GM got fleeced as a number of people are making it sound, but we are working to rework the deal for the sake of the league.

I agree with you but you can’t get upset when a trade gets vetoed or a GM doesn’t respond.

I can when I disagree?
As for a GM not responding, I don’t think there’s any excuse for that, unless of course the GM expecting a response is practically harassing them.

[UOducksTK1]

If it makes you feel better, I had 8 trades veto'd in the first few seasons. That's gotta be a record still I'm sure.

It's cause TK hates me

It's true. Ownage is way more gracious when it comes to vetos, so when he does a veto, you know it's bad.

[Oregon Ownage]

If it makes you feel better, I had 8 trades veto'd in the first few seasons. That's gotta be a record still I'm sure.

It's cause TK hates me

It's true. Ownage is way more gracious when it comes to vetos, so when he does a veto, you know it's bad.

Eddy is close to vetoed trades in the early years of the league

[pudgejeff]

If it makes you feel better, I had 8 trades veto'd in the first few seasons. That's gotta be a record still I'm sure.

It's cause TK hates me

It's true. Ownage is way more gracious when it comes to vetos, so when he does a veto, you know it's bad.

[eddy_zamora]

If it makes you feel better, I had 8 trades veto'd in the first few seasons. That's gotta be a record still I'm sure.

It's cause TK hates me

It's true. Ownage is way more gracious when it comes to vetos, so when he does a veto, you know it's bad.

Eddy is close to vetoed trades in the early years of the league

I’ve reformed, please