#7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- greenyellow
- Moderator
- Posts: 35931
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
#7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
3-0 #7 Stanford vs 3-0 #20 Oregon
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 15969
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
I don't think my boss is giving out tickets to this game. darn.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3469
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am
- Duckenstein
- Freshman
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
I think we may be surprised
I think this will be a competitive game
I think this will be a competitive game
- FlDuckFan
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5068
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am
- GM: Orlando Magic GM
- Location: Florida
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Like all Stanford games, this is going to a long game. I love the Ducks but my confidence in the team.
I see a lot of open running lanes for Stanford.
I see a lot of open running lanes for Stanford.
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:52 pm
- Location: Salem, OR
- Contact:
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Do we have a visitor list for the game? It would seem with Gameday coming that this would be a fun time to have them on campus.
- duckduckgoose
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:45 pm
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Oregon’s run defense has been STOUT so far this year. What makes you think that Stanford will gash it so easily?FlDuckFan wrote:Like all Stanford games, this is going to a long game. I love the Ducks but my confidence in the team.
I see a lot of open running lanes for Stanford.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- EncinitasDuck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:45 pm
- Location: Grants Pass Oregon
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Agreed Stanford running game so farduckduckgoose wrote:Oregon’s run defense has been STOUT so far this year. What makes you think that Stanford will gash it so easily?FlDuckFan wrote:Like all Stanford games, this is going to a long game. I love the Ducks but my confidence in the team.
I see a lot of open running lanes for Stanford.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
SDSU - 59 yds
USC - 159 yds
UCDavis - 137 yds
Not exactly the power run Stanford we all know and sort of hate.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3091
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:15 am
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
I think the first game for Stanford the offensive line did not play well. The second game was against USC and they probably have a lot better defensive line than they saw the first game. The third game was without Bryce Love. I think that is part of the problem Stanford has had so far running the ball.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 4747
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Home field is usually worth 3 points so Vegas thought Stanford was 1.5 points better than us. I was expecting Stanford -3 for the opening line.Merganzer wrote:http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/matchups/
Oregon opened -1.5 line moved to Stanford -1
- Juice
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:19 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Not at all looking forward to the Thomas Graham Jr./JJ Arcega-Whiteside matchup Everywhere else defensively I am really confident, especially with what SHOULD be a pretty intense Autzen crowd.
Offensively I'm hoping we can get more out of the run game, and that Herbie looks a lot sharper than he did Saturday. The drops from the WR at this point are going to be what they are.
As far as special teams are concerned, hoping we can get some big plays by the return units, and pray that it doesn't come down to field goals lol even if Adam Stack is supposed to be back.
Offensively I'm hoping we can get more out of the run game, and that Herbie looks a lot sharper than he did Saturday. The drops from the WR at this point are going to be what they are.
As far as special teams are concerned, hoping we can get some big plays by the return units, and pray that it doesn't come down to field goals lol even if Adam Stack is supposed to be back.
-
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:06 pm
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
Yeah, JJ had a line of 6/112/2TD last year when we played them and I don't know if our corners are that much better this year. Hopefully we continue to get some good pass rushing.Juice wrote:Not at all looking forward to the Thomas Graham Jr./JJ Arcega-Whiteside matchup Everywhere else defensively I am really confident, especially with what SHOULD be a pretty intense Autzen crowd.
Offensively I'm hoping we can get more out of the run game, and that Herbie looks a lot sharper than he did Saturday. The drops from the WR at this point are going to be what they are.
As far as special teams are concerned, hoping we can get some big plays by the return units, and pray that it doesn't come down to field goals lol even if Adam Stack is supposed to be back.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37770
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
I'm just hoping it's close and it'll be a fun/electric game. Gonna be my first game attending this year, so really excited to be back in Autzen.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
I don't think Altman would be OK with it, but I'd love to see them borrow Paul White and Kenny Wooten for a week of practice and have the DB's try to keep them from getting "rebounds" as practice.
But yes, making sure we have the right matchups in the secondary is going to be important. I think Holland and Lenoir have more of the physical size to compete with those guys. Pickett is 6ft 1, Haki Woods 6ft 3, and Hailassie is 6ft 2. Try to match up size a bit. (although it's not just size, it's also strength and technique with those big guys). In the RZ, we might even get away with Hollins or Jelks trying to jam them at the line, as they are both 6ft 6.
Andrew Luck's last year there, where we really put a whooping on them down on the farm, we had Dion Jordan doing just that sort of thing and a physical guy in Eddie Pleasant in the secondary going up against them on those deep balls.
But yes, making sure we have the right matchups in the secondary is going to be important. I think Holland and Lenoir have more of the physical size to compete with those guys. Pickett is 6ft 1, Haki Woods 6ft 3, and Hailassie is 6ft 2. Try to match up size a bit. (although it's not just size, it's also strength and technique with those big guys). In the RZ, we might even get away with Hollins or Jelks trying to jam them at the line, as they are both 6ft 6.
Andrew Luck's last year there, where we really put a whooping on them down on the farm, we had Dion Jordan doing just that sort of thing and a physical guy in Eddie Pleasant in the secondary going up against them on those deep balls.
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: #7 Stanford @ #20 Oregon (Sept. 22, Sat 5 PM ABC)
We should also get the refs to call offensive PI on fade routes.