Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Just want to also say that Graham and Lenoir were lights out today


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

chapelhillduck wrote:Just want to also say that Graham and Lenoir were lights out today

I second that sentiment.

^ shades of Ifo.

I'd say Graham and Lenoir have had real noticeable leaps in production and quality of play as of late. Not always happy with their tackling but their coverage has been really good.

I would love it if we could get a decent punter. Sick of these short 37 yard punts and and inability to pin them within the 20 yard line when we are punting from our half of the field.

alxtw wrote:I would love it if we could get a decent punter. Sick of these short 37 yard punts and and inability to pin them within the 20 yard line when we are punting from our half of the field.

Yep, that was a crap game for the punter. Only 36.5 average and the one got into the endzone that might've redeemed him. Stack's FG range is effectively 30 yards so that's cool too.

After tonight, Oregon is the second worst points against/game in the entire Pac-12 in conference games. Radical.

I had to finish watching the game on DVR this morning, oh how I love PAC 12 after dark!...... not! Bottom line...... my most important take away from this game...... it's a win! 7-4. Should be 8-4 after Friday! Bowl game! Extra practices, loving the season!

Pac12 after dark is such a bad idea

Fans can't watch it unless they're on the west coast and the rest of the country can conveniently forget the the pac12 exists. Another Larry Scott fail

Great, gritty win. Good defense. Build some mental fortitude last night

Alan wrote:I had to finish watching the game on DVR this morning, oh how I love PAC 12 after dark!...... not! Bottom line...... my most important take away from this game...... it's a win! 7-4. Should be 8-4 after Friday! Bowl game! Extra practices, loving the season!

Graham and Lenoir really were improved for the most part tonight. I was complaining about the punting too, but my dad sad it was so Harry couldn't return them. I don't remember him returning any of them so maybe tonight's punts were by designed.

chapelhillduck wrote:Just want to also say that Graham and Lenoir were lights out today


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t want to rain on Thomas but most of Graham’s break ups were just plain dropped by harry

Alan wrote:I had to finish watching the game on DVR this morning, oh how I love PAC 12 after dark!...... not! Bottom line...... my most important take away from this game...... it's a win! 7-4. Should be 8-4 after Friday! Bowl game! Extra practices, loving the season!

Exactly. We can still win 9 games this year. Ugly or not, that's a solid season.

buckmarkduck wrote:

Alan wrote:I had to finish watching the game on DVR this morning, oh how I love PAC 12 after dark!...... not! Bottom line...... my most important take away from this game...... it's a win! 7-4. Should be 8-4 after Friday! Bowl game! Extra practices, loving the season!

Exactly. We can still win 9 games this year. Ugly or not, that's a solid season.

I agree, I usually work Sunday mornings so 730 start is a nightmare for me

This W has a very UCLA game feeling to it. We won but still a big “meh” IMO. Coaching staff had a great game plan on both sides of the ball but players made a bunch of boneheaded plays. Dropped balls, iffy throws, stupid decisions in the return game etc. Glad we won but worried about another game on the road next week.

buckmarkduck wrote:Exactly. We can still win 9 games this year. Ugly or not, that's a solid season.

If the Ducks were to reach 9 wins (which is a big if), that would also mean they won the 3 most important games of the season (Washington, Civil War, bowl game). That would definitely make the season more palatable. Regardless, I am still as skeptical about our coaching acumen at this moment as I was following the bowl game debacle last season.