Usually after lottery players are pick Ownage posts rest of notes.Craig wrote:Do we have an ETA on the test of the draft notes, if there are more?
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
1988 Draft Discussion
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
TonightCraig wrote:Do we have an ETA on the test of the draft notes, if there are more?
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Draft has gone faster than I anticipated
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
If anyone wants to send me a DM tonight about a player lmk. I should be free until 7pm eastern time
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Foxyg1396
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:27 pm
- GM: Denver Nuggets
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Not draft related but when are we finding out post season prediction results?
- FlDuckFan
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5068
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am
- GM: Orlando Magic GM
- Location: Florida
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
I've been burned by "Amazing Raw Potential " way to many times.jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly I would have taken him at 2. Franchise was keyword. With PGs being non scoring his B inside scoring really helped him. I mean notes only go so far but he was one that didn’t disappoint.FlDuckFan wrote:Split between two guys hopefully I made the right choice.
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Files have been updated through pick 15
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
FlDuckFan wrote:I've been burned by "Amazing Raw Potential " way to many times.jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly I would have taken him at 2. Franchise was keyword. With PGs being non scoring his B inside scoring really helped him. I mean notes only go so far but he was one that didn’t disappoint.FlDuckFan wrote:Split between two guys hopefully I made the right choice.
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Draft notes are all done
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Felt like the obvious pick for the Pistons there. Thunder Dan is a great pick. I have to wonder if he'd gone earlier if his notes (and in particular his very good potential) were up sooner. Regardless, he was always there for the pickings. Was #11 overall on my list though looking at it now he was right ahead of Charles Smith, so really should have been #12.
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
I really wanted him coming in but notes on SGs were up like 30-60mins after my deadline so i didnt really wanna do it blind lolThe Bean Regime wrote:Felt like the obvious pick for the Pistons there. Thunder Dan is a great pick. I have to wonder if he'd gone earlier if his notes (and in particular his very good potential) were up sooner. Regardless, he was always there for the pickings. Was #11 overall on my list though looking at it now he was right ahead of Charles Smith, so really should have been #12.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
SUNS GM
-
- Junior
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:56 pm
- GM: Detroit Pistons GM
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
This makes me feel a little better. I was torn between 2-3 guys but kept coming back to Marjerle as the pick.Craig wrote:I really wanted him coming in but notes on SGs were up like 30-60mins after my deadline so i didnt really wanna do it blind lolThe Bean Regime wrote:Felt like the obvious pick for the Pistons there. Thunder Dan is a great pick. I have to wonder if he'd gone earlier if his notes (and in particular his very good potential) were up sooner. Regardless, he was always there for the pickings. Was #11 overall on my list though looking at it now he was right ahead of Charles Smith, so really should have been #12.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
I tried my best to trade up with you for Thunder Dan good pick!DrBradBuss wrote:This makes me feel a little better. I was torn between 2-3 guys but kept coming back to Marjerle as the pick.Craig wrote:I really wanted him coming in but notes on SGs were up like 30-60mins after my deadline so i didnt really wanna do it blind lolThe Bean Regime wrote:Felt like the obvious pick for the Pistons there. Thunder Dan is a great pick. I have to wonder if he'd gone earlier if his notes (and in particular his very good potential) were up sooner. Regardless, he was always there for the pickings. Was #11 overall on my list though looking at it now he was right ahead of Charles Smith, so really should have been #12.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Now that I have Kerr, its a surefire that MJ comes to me right? That’s how this game works?
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Should have gotten Oak, Kerr and Jordan were.... less than tight as seen by the famous practice fistfight.offtheheezy wrote:Now that I have Kerr, its a surefire that MJ comes to me right? That’s how this game works?
Hornets GM
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: 1988 Draft Discussion
Cellar-door wrote:Should have gotten Oak, Kerr and Jordan were.... less than tight as seen by the famous practice fistfight.offtheheezy wrote:Now that I have Kerr, its a surefire that MJ comes to me right? That’s how this game works?
That's ok, he still needs that guy to hit game winners for him. It used to be Sampson, Freeman tried this year and failed. Kerr next year