Clips/Sonics
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2964
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
Clips/Sonics
Supersonics send:
Jarrett Wedge
Jabari Smith
Bryant Reeves
Paul Pierce
Pablo Prigioni (offseason tradeback)
Sonics next 2nd (02 I think)
Clips send:
For
Kenny Anderson
Cal Bowdler
Accept.
Jarrett Wedge
Jabari Smith
Bryant Reeves
Paul Pierce
Pablo Prigioni (offseason tradeback)
Sonics next 2nd (02 I think)
Clips send:
For
Kenny Anderson
Cal Bowdler
Accept.
---
PistolPeteJR
PistolPeteJR
- vincent1469
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
- GM: Seattle Supersonics
Re: Clips/Sonics
Accept
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Clips/Sonics
Clippers need cuts and also puts them over hardcap
Needs reworking
Needs reworking
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2964
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
Re: Clips/Sonics
How?Oregon Ownage wrote:Clippers need cuts and also puts them over hardcap
Needs reworking
Wedge
Smith
Reeves
Pierce
Prigioni (offseason tradeback)
2nd
= $18,907,796
For
Anderson
Mitchell
= $17,340,850
Keeps me under hard cap and him too?
---
PistolPeteJR
PistolPeteJR
- the goat
- Freshman
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:40 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Lakers
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Clips/Sonics
Without Mitchell you are over the hardcap so adding the Mitchell salary doesnt change anything, you need to add salary already on your rosterpistolpetejr wrote:How?Oregon Ownage wrote:Clippers need cuts and also puts them over hardcap
Needs reworking
Wedge
Smith
Reeves
Pierce
Prigioni (offseason tradeback)
2nd
= $18,907,796
For
Anderson
Mitchell
= $17,340,850
Keeps me under hard cap and him too?
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2964
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
Re: Clips/Sonics
Got it. Make it Bowdler tradeback instead please. Thank you. @Sonics please accept.Oregon Ownage wrote:Without Mitchell you are over the hardcap so adding the Mitchell salary doesnt change anything, you need to add salary already on your rosterpistolpetejr wrote:How?Oregon Ownage wrote:Clippers need cuts and also puts them over hardcap
Needs reworking
Wedge
Smith
Reeves
Pierce
Prigioni (offseason tradeback)
2nd
= $18,907,796
For
Anderson
Mitchell
= $17,340,850
Keeps me under hard cap and him too?
---
PistolPeteJR
PistolPeteJR
- vincent1469
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
- GM: Seattle Supersonics
Re: Clips/Sonics
Accept
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: Clips/Sonics
The progression from Gathers to Gugliotta to KA and a lotto pick to 3rd year PP within one season is amazing. Well played
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Clips/Sonics
^ thisofftheheezy wrote:The progression from Gathers to Gugliotta to KA and a lotto pick to 3rd year PP within one season is amazing. Well played
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4817
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Clips/Sonics
gosh, I just don't understand this from sonics perspective.... As of right now, is Anderson even better than Pierce? If he is, it's not by much...
And then add in the age difference, contract difference, and potential difference..... and I'd assert that Pierce by himself has (significantly) more current value than Anderson.
I would've expected Anderson + depth (or picks) for Pierce.. not the other way around.
And then add in the age difference, contract difference, and potential difference..... and I'd assert that Pierce by himself has (significantly) more current value than Anderson.
I would've expected Anderson + depth (or picks) for Pierce.. not the other way around.
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: Clips/Sonics
I'd add to this, to any GM who is about to do a big trade, don't hesitate to reach out to: myself, Ownage, Grizzlies, Nets, Celtics etc and see what their thoughts aredd10snoop28 wrote:gosh, I just don't understand this from sonics perspective.... As of right now, is Anderson even better than Pierce? If he is, it's not by much...
And then add in the age difference, contract difference, and potential difference..... and I'd assert that Pierce by himself has (significantly) more current value than Anderson.
I would've expected Anderson + depth (or picks) for Pierce.. not the other way around.
I've probably done ~ 50 seasons of sim league now and still message other GMs about 80-90% of the deals I'm considering just to gauge others' opinions.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3549
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Clips/Sonics
I didn't get this either for all the same reasons as you, plus it makes the Sonics extremely thin at SF now.dd10snoop28 wrote:gosh, I just don't understand this from sonics perspective.... As of right now, is Anderson even better than Pierce? If he is, it's not by much...
And then add in the age difference, contract difference, and potential difference..... and I'd assert that Pierce by himself has (significantly) more current value than Anderson.
I would've expected Anderson + depth (or picks) for Pierce.. not the other way around.
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: Clips/Sonics
Where is this 'trade the best player AND extras for a high level prospect by himself' sentiment coming from? Is it just name recognition/nostalgia? Where is this guarantee that guys like Pierce are going to end up as high end superstars? The normal market is great player in his prime for a young piece plus maybe some extras to account for the risk in the young guy(s) not panning out. Or at the least its a straight swap. Did I miss something? Maybe Anderson doesnt quite fit the bill since he's a bit older and arguably not quite a top 5-10 player but still...
All that said is an independent thought though, I dont think this is a great move for Sonics either.
All that said is an independent thought though, I dont think this is a great move for Sonics either.
Last edited by Craig on Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
SUNS GM
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3549
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Clips/Sonics
I do this a lot too.lukeyrid13 wrote:I'd add to this, to any GM who is about to do a big trade, don't hesitate to reach out to: myself, Ownage, Grizzlies, Nets, Celtics etc and see what their thoughts aredd10snoop28 wrote:gosh, I just don't understand this from sonics perspective.... As of right now, is Anderson even better than Pierce? If he is, it's not by much...
And then add in the age difference, contract difference, and potential difference..... and I'd assert that Pierce by himself has (significantly) more current value than Anderson.
I would've expected Anderson + depth (or picks) for Pierce.. not the other way around.
I've probably done ~ 50 seasons of sim league now and still message other GMs about 80-90% of the deals I'm considering just to gauge others' opinions.