Re: Portal Needs - 2024
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:28 pm
I’m ready.bellsduck wrote:Time to place your bets on Oregon for a NC
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/
I’m ready.bellsduck wrote:Time to place your bets on Oregon for a NC
Depends on how our QB rental for next year pans out.nogerO wrote:I’m ready.bellsduck wrote:Time to place your bets on Oregon for a NC
I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.alxtw wrote:Depends on how our QB rental for next year pans out.nogerO wrote:I’m ready.bellsduck wrote:Time to place your bets on Oregon for a NC
Seriously? You have better feelings about a QB with a 16-9 record as a starter over the past 2 seasons than a coach with a 22-5 record over the same span, with three of those losses to eventual playoff winners and potential national champions?webfoots2001 wrote: I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.
This staff is good at beating up bad teams. They always start slow and have to crawl back into games. It's fine against weaker competition, but can't expect to be a legit contender when you only show up for three quarters. Same thing with Stein always designing throws behind the line of scrimmage, it works great against the teams that can't tackle our backs--but the offense is simply not explosive versus good teams.Phalanx wrote:Seriously? You have better feelings about a QB with a 16-9 record as a starter over the past 2 seasons than a coach with a 22-5 record over the same span, with three of those losses to eventual playoff winners and potential national champions?webfoots2001 wrote: I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.
If you watched OU play the last two years and think he was the reason they lost those nine games it really isn’t worth continuing this conversation.Phalanx wrote:Seriously? You have better feelings about a QB with a 16-9 record as a starter over the past 2 seasons than a coach with a 22-5 record over the same span, with three of those losses to eventual playoff winners and potential national champions?webfoots2001 wrote: I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.
Seeing that Washington is undefeated and in the NCG, primarily due to their offense, I would think it's fair to say that nobody truly bottled them up.webfoots2001 wrote:If you watched OU play the last two years and think he was the reason they lost those nine games it really isn’t worth continuing this conversation.Phalanx wrote:Seriously? You have better feelings about a QB with a 16-9 record as a starter over the past 2 seasons than a coach with a 22-5 record over the same span, with three of those losses to eventual playoff winners and potential national champions?webfoots2001 wrote: I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.
I do have concerns about a head coach and staff that can watch osu and WSU bottle up the uw offense on back to back weeks with far lesser defensive talent (even compared to our poor coverage safeties) yet the following week the huskies were able to do anything they wanted offensively against us.
Each team held them to nearly 200 yards and two scores less than Oregon was able to in the championship game.squintsdd wrote:Seeing that Washington is undefeated and in the NCG, primarily due to their offense, I would think it's fair to say that nobody truly bottled them up.webfoots2001 wrote:If you watched OU play the last two years and think he was the reason they lost those nine games it really isn’t worth continuing this conversation.Phalanx wrote:Seriously? You have better feelings about a QB with a 16-9 record as a starter over the past 2 seasons than a coach with a 22-5 record over the same span, with three of those losses to eventual playoff winners and potential national champions?webfoots2001 wrote: I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.
I do have concerns about a head coach and staff that can watch osu and WSU bottle up the uw offense on back to back weeks with far lesser defensive talent (even compared to our poor coverage safeties) yet the following week the huskies were able to do anything they wanted offensively against us.
He's going to be a potential starter. At worst, he's their 3rd or 4th CB. His PFF grade was higher than Khyree Jackson's and was named defensive MVP in UTSA's bowl game.OG Duck wrote:What are everyone's expectations for Kam Alexander? Is he starter material? Or more of a depth piece?
Penix had bruised/busted ribs playing against ASU (sustained against Oregon) and the UW team was riddled with the flu against OSU.webfoots2001 wrote:Each team held them to nearly 200 yards and two scores less than Oregon was able to in the championship game.squintsdd wrote:Seeing that Washington is undefeated and in the NCG, primarily due to their offense, I would think it's fair to say that nobody truly bottled them up.webfoots2001 wrote:If you watched OU play the last two years and think he was the reason they lost those nine games it really isn’t worth continuing this conversation.Phalanx wrote:Seriously? You have better feelings about a QB with a 16-9 record as a starter over the past 2 seasons than a coach with a 22-5 record over the same span, with three of those losses to eventual playoff winners and potential national champions?webfoots2001 wrote: I’m far less concerned about a QB who’s already an all time top 10 passer than a coach that’s a great recruiter but has only beaten one team that finished a season with less than four losses.
I do have concerns about a head coach and staff that can watch osu and WSU bottle up the uw offense on back to back weeks with far lesser defensive talent (even compared to our poor coverage safeties) yet the following week the huskies were able to do anything they wanted offensively against us.
I wonder if the weather of those games had any factor in this or the number of healthy WRs? Probably not.webfoots2001 wrote:Each team held them to nearly 200 yards and two scores less than Oregon was able to in the championship game.