Page 13 of 13
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:04 pm
by oregontrack
I will take the last word, it's part of the winner's bounty. It's nice of you to finally acknowledge your defeat like that.
Seriously, though, no need for a meltdown, friend. You were wrong about something on the internet. It happens.
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:35 pm
by wheaton4prez
Came across this article that cites some substantial information on this:
http://www.omaha.com/article/20100613/B ... 12-revenue
BIG 12 2008-09 REVENUE SHARING
1. Oklahoma, $12.2 million
2. Texas, $11.8 million
3. Kansas, $11.5 million
4. Missouri, $10.4 million
5. Texas A&M, $10.2 million
6. Oklahoma State, $10.0 million
7. Colorado, $9.77 million
8. Nebraska, $9.73 million
9. Texas Tech, $9.2 million
10. Baylor, $9.1 million
11. Iowa State, $8.9 million
12. Kansas State, $8.4 million
So, it looks like oregontrack guessed correctly. Colorado brought in slightly more revenue than Baylor last year. Not sure how much additional travel costs between the Texas schools and Colorado would off-set this.