Pro Combat Throwbacks???

[Supreme]

I guessed earlier in the year that the team would wear an away variation of last years throwbacks. Good deal.

[greenyellow]

I think Oregon can have Nike make any jersey from any era, except possibly ones with the Duck through the O, but Nike will probably stick to ones they've actually made for Oregon.

[duckfan96]

Should do the unis from Joeys sr year. Would those be considered throwbacks?

[gofightingducks]

Should do the unis from Joeys sr year. Would those be considered throwbacks?

As much as I used to like those jerseys, they are pretty ugly by today's standards.

I liked them at the time also but looking back they are quite ugly, but they would be cool to bring back as a throwback at some time.

[duckfan96]

Most throwbacks are ugly by todays standards. Would be a tribute to gettin screwed over by the bcs last time around. haha

[24webfoot]

barkrats to roll out flat black helmets?

[gofightingducks]

barkrats to roll out flat black helmets?

They are part of their Pro Combat "Giant Killer" uni's

[ducklovinlady]

Does anyone think it's weird to consider 2001 a throwback era? lol- seems like yesterday to me.

[Duck07]

Yes but those were well before Nike was established and perhaps they bought the licensing rights to them...not certain,

All I know was the chatter last year around the 95/96 unis were they were not Nike so Nike would not replicate THOSE ones - perhaps it is licensing rights to the uni's in the early 90's from Russell Athletic

Or, perhaps it is tied to the licensing rights to Disney, since it used the duck on the sleeve. If so, maybe it's not an issue anymore with Disney releasing the rights back to Oregon???

Disney probably still owns the rights to logo with Donald running through the big block letter O.

I thought Disney relented all rights associated with Puddles and our usage of the "duck."

[greenyellow]

Yes but those were well before Nike was established and perhaps they bought the licensing rights to them...not certain,

All I know was the chatter last year around the 95/96 unis were they were not Nike so Nike would not replicate THOSE ones - perhaps it is licensing rights to the uni's in the early 90's from Russell Athletic

Or, perhaps it is tied to the licensing rights to Disney, since it used the duck on the sleeve. If so, maybe it's not an issue anymore with Disney releasing the rights back to Oregon???

Disney probably still owns the rights to logo with Donald running through the big block letter O.

I thought Disney relented all rights associated with Puddles and our usage of the "duck."

I'm not sure what was all included in the usage agreement. It could be Oregon can only use The Duck suit at anytime but not the "Duck Through the O" logo outside the state. Someone would have to look it up or ask someone in the athletic department.

[DaZoo3]

I would love to see combat jerseys.

[liberalduck]

Yes but those were well before Nike was established and perhaps they bought the licensing rights to them...not certain,

All I know was the chatter last year around the 95/96 unis were they were not Nike so Nike would not replicate THOSE ones - perhaps it is licensing rights to the uni's in the early 90's from Russell Athletic

Or, perhaps it is tied to the licensing rights to Disney, since it used the duck on the sleeve. If so, maybe it's not an issue anymore with Disney releasing the rights back to Oregon???

I am not positive on this, but my understanding regarding the Oregon mascot is that Disney still owns the rights of Donald when it is used on apparel and other items, but not with the mascot itself, which they say is not Donald but rather, "The Duck.". In other words, I think they get royalties from merchandise but have removed restrictions on use of the actual mascot itself. That is why "The Duck" can now do commercials and other events that it couldn't do before. I think I am correct on this. In any case, it sure sounds good to me. If you know differently, let me know.

[greenyellow]

Yes but those were well before Nike was established and perhaps they bought the licensing rights to them...not certain,

All I know was the chatter last year around the 95/96 unis were they were not Nike so Nike would not replicate THOSE ones - perhaps it is licensing rights to the uni's in the early 90's from Russell Athletic

Or, perhaps it is tied to the licensing rights to Disney, since it used the duck on the sleeve. If so, maybe it's not an issue anymore with Disney releasing the rights back to Oregon???

I am not positive on this, but my understanding regarding the Oregon mascot is that Disney still owns the rights of Donald when it is used on apparel and other items, but not with the mascot itself, which they say is not Donald but rather, "The Duck.". In other words, I think they get royalties from merchandise but have removed restrictions on use of the actual mascot itself. That is why "The Duck" can now do commercials and other events that it couldn't do before. I think I am correct on this. In any case, it sure sounds good to me. If you know differently, let me know.

I think that sounds about right since the usage of the Duck got further clarified after his appearance in Supwitugirl's music video.

[spacefrog13x]

my sources say no new uniform for the ducks for the civil war. But nike will have a one time uniform for the ducks for the bowl game.

[KeenanHowry15]

my sources say no new uniform for the ducks for the civil war. But nike will have a one time uniform for the ducks for the bowl game.

who's your source?