Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
woundedknees
- All-American
- Posts: 12821
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm
Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
Poor Dawg fans...
Just because LSU happens to trip up in their scheduling, and accidentally play a decent OOC team on the road on occasion (It happens what, every other year, at most?), doesn't make the Montlake MudPuppies significant, relevant, or mean that the FlushPuppies have a snowball's chance of becoming that in the foreseeable future...
Surely, the Tigers wouldn't deliberately waste the time, money, and sleep deprivation necessary to travel this far to take a chance on getting embarrassed, especially on national TV, do you ?
Heck, once they figured out the Beavs were only a field goal (Or 3 PATs) away from beating them in their own house, LSU has never shown an interest in travelling to CornValley, where 13 fans and a distracted sheep in the stands constitutes too much of a 'homefield advantage' for the risk to be worth it.
Just because LSU happens to trip up in their scheduling, and accidentally play a decent OOC team on the road on occasion (It happens what, every other year, at most?), doesn't make the Montlake MudPuppies significant, relevant, or mean that the FlushPuppies have a snowball's chance of becoming that in the foreseeable future...
Surely, the Tigers wouldn't deliberately waste the time, money, and sleep deprivation necessary to travel this far to take a chance on getting embarrassed, especially on national TV, do you ?
Heck, once they figured out the Beavs were only a field goal (Or 3 PATs) away from beating them in their own house, LSU has never shown an interest in travelling to CornValley, where 13 fans and a distracted sheep in the stands constitutes too much of a 'homefield advantage' for the risk to be worth it.
Last edited by woundedknees on Tue May 05, 2009 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!


- VinnyKnuckles
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:34 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarilly!
I doubt the Dawgs keep that game within 3 touchdowns. It will be quite the shock to Jake of Nazareth's system when he finds himself facing LSU's first-string defense, after practicing against the likes of Tripper Johnson and the other assorted stiffs the Huskies have running around in their secondary.

-
Destroyer77
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarilly!
hahaha, "Jake of Nazareth".... made my day!VinnyKnuckles wrote:I doubt the Dawgs keep that game within 3 touchdowns. It will be quite the shock to Jake of Nazareth's system when he finds himself facing LSU's first-string defense, after practicing against the likes of Tripper Johnson and the other assorted stiffs the Huskies have running around in their secondary.
-
BisonDucks
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:26 pm
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
Jake was 18-20 in their spring game...better watch out!
-
woundedknees
- All-American
- Posts: 12821
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
18/20 against the UW 2's and 3's... And we have seen how good the UW 1's were last year.
I will believe Jeezus of the Lakeside has become a QB when it is shown against real competition.
I will believe Jeezus of the Lakeside has become a QB when it is shown against real competition.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!


- spinseeker
- Freshman
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:32 am
- Location: Springfield
- Contact:
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
Correction - 16-18 and two dropped passes.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/h ... wfb26.html
Really, though, who wouldn't want to see LSU get beat by Washington. I hope UW gets two wins this season. LSU and ND. The SEC's godlike preseason status really bothers me.
Wasn't Auburn top ten last season? And Tennessee top 25?
How ridiculous did that look three weeks in to the season, much less at the end of the season?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/h ... wfb26.html
Really, though, who wouldn't want to see LSU get beat by Washington. I hope UW gets two wins this season. LSU and ND. The SEC's godlike preseason status really bothers me.
-
woundedknees
- All-American
- Posts: 12821
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
If the Messiah of Montlake completes 16/18 against LSU, it would make for entertaining TV... I just don't seriously believe it's possible.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!


-
freedjr
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:23 am
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
As much as I would like to say huck the fuskies, how great would it be if the Pac-10's worst team beat one of the SEC's better teams?
-
woundedknees
- All-American
- Posts: 12821
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm
- ncduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
It would be awesome! As long as it's the only game of the year they win.
-
jhopduck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:53 am
- Location: Medford, OR
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
Yeah 18/20 against UW's D, that's like having Masoli throw against all freshman walk on's for us. Wouldn't even be fair. Although Jake is a talented individual.
-
goducks75
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
- Location: Tigard/Eugene
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarilly!
Hey now it's the Messiah of Montlake. Get it rightVinnyKnuckles wrote:I doubt the Dawgs keep that game within 3 touchdowns. It will be quite the shock to Jake of Nazareth's system when he finds himself facing LSU's first-string defense, after practicing against the likes of Tripper Johnson and the other assorted stiffs the Huskies have running around in their secondary.
-
goducks75
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
- Location: Tigard/Eugene
Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!
That'd be awesome as much as it pains me to admit it. It'd shut up all those SEC clowns.freedjr wrote:As much as I would like to say huck the fuskies, how great would it be if the Pac-10's worst team beat one of the SEC's better teams?
- spinseeker
- Freshman
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:32 am
- Location: Springfield
- Contact:
