Give me a F'ing break!

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Destroyer77
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Give me a F'ing break!

Post by Destroyer77 »

Affirmative Action was never INTENDED to make mandatory quotas of minorities. It was INTENDED to force employers to market the positions to minorities based on a cross section of the community. In short, the only "quota" an employer would have to deal with would be in the attempt to RECRUIT minorities, not actualy hire them in a minimum number. However, confusion and overzelousness made it so that some employers actualy did hire based upon quotas. This caused the backlash that we see today against Affirmative Action. Affirmative Action is not a failed endeavor in and of itself, it is the fault of confused employers and those with unethical agendas that have made it a negative buzzword. As a disclaimer, I am a white male.

To be forced to interview a minority for something like a head coaching position is nothing more than a hurdle, government red tape. It's an annoyance at best and will never force anyone to actualy hire someone based upon their race. To me, it's no big deal. It just costs the University slightly more money and time to bring someone in to interview.
TualatinDuck
Senior
Posts: 2439
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:23 am
Location: Tualatin

Re: Give me a F'ing break!

Post by TualatinDuck »

Destroyer, you have a very strong understanding of not only the intent of affirmative action, but also the practice. Explain that though in relation to the California University system that left so many white people having to choose a secondary school because a lesser qualified minority was given admission above them.
"And I can be the warrior for those who are frail and weak,
And I can be the compass for those that search and seek." ~Lem Absher
User avatar
Tray Dub
Senior
Posts: 4994
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Give me a F'ing break!

Post by Tray Dub »

Destroyer77 wrote: To be forced to interview a minority for something like a head coaching position is nothing more than a hurdle, government red tape. It's an annoyance at best and will never force anyone to actualy hire someone based upon their race. To me, it's no big deal. It just costs the University slightly more money and time to bring someone in to interview.
This. If an AD is determined to not hire a black guy, one interview won't change his mind. And if he doesn't care about the guy's skin color, there's no reason for the law. Pretty simple stuff.
Destroyer77
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Give me a F'ing break!

Post by Destroyer77 »

TualatinDuck wrote:Destroyer, you have a very strong understanding of not only the intent of affirmative action, but also the practice. Explain that though in relation to the California University system that left so many white people having to choose a secondary school because a lesser qualified minority was given admission above them.
Exactly my point. Hiring agencies have either misunderstood the intent or used it maliciously to further a liberalist agenda.
spacefrog13x
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:40 am

Re: Give me a F'ing break!

Post by spacefrog13x »

When...Oh When...dear lord is the white man going to get a fair shake in American society

(end sarcasm).
Destroyer77
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Give me a F'ing break!

Post by Destroyer77 »

spacefrog13x wrote:When...Oh When...dear lord is the white man going to get a fair shake in American society

(end sarcasm).
I believe that you read and understood the entire thread before making this comment. (end sarcasm)
Post Reply