Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

duck55
Senior
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Keizer OR

Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by duck55 »

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... aaf,181904

Interesting article comparing Pryor to U Bolt in speed.
User avatar
briarduck
Senior
Posts: 3183
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
Location: Milwaukie OR

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by briarduck »

All the BS aside about how he was timed...dude is crazy fast for a 6'6" 235 QB! He has a very bright future and will make alot of money and I'm still disappointed we didn't get a chance to show off our program because he'd be better as a Duck!

GO DUCKS!!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
User avatar
brich75
Senior
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by brich75 »

speaking of 40 times, does anybody know what Masoli's is... I'm not sure I've ever seen it. I would guess he is in the 4.7 range just from watching him?
Image
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by woundedknees »

Scout reports a 4.5/40 for Masoli, Rivals a 4.6...
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
SuperDuck
Senior
Posts: 4643
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by SuperDuck »

Hmmm...

Interesting thought. Pryor is a phenomenal athlete. That being said, would anyone start Pryor over the Masoli we saw play in the Holiday Bowl? What if TP had chosen to become a Duck? Would anyone be willing to start him over JM?

It'll be interesting to watch as they both develop further over the next 1-2 seasons, but at this point, I'm very happy having Jeremiah Masoli as our QB.
John 3:36
northbeachsf
Freshman
Posts: 1494
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:54 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by northbeachsf »

duck55 wrote:http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... aaf,181904

Interesting article comparing Pryor to U Bolt in speed.
Good article. College times are a joke. Dude is super fast, but he probably really runs in the neighborhood of 4.45.

How about Bey at 4.30 in the combine? That is fricking amazing and is probably a legit time. No wonder the Raiders took him. They love unpolished receivers that can flat out fly.
User avatar
brich75
Senior
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by brich75 »

northbeachsf wrote:
duck55 wrote:http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/b ... aaf,181904

Interesting article comparing Pryor to U Bolt in speed.
Good article. College times are a joke. Dude is super fast, but he probably really runs in the neighborhood of 4.45.

How about Bey at 4.30 in the combine? That is fricking amazing and is probably a legit time. No wonder the Raiders took him. They love unpolished receivers that can flat out fly.
ya bey is going to be a freak with the right coaching
Image
User avatar
brich75
Senior
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by brich75 »

woundedknees wrote:Scout reports a 4.5/40 for Masoli, Rivals a 4.6...
funny to me that the coaches always say they recruited him for his arm and had no idea he could run.. When a quarter back is posting a 4.5 40 time you have a pretty good idea he can run.. in some cases even RUN OVER!!
Image
duck55
Senior
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Keizer OR

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by duck55 »

brich75 wrote:
woundedknees wrote:Scout reports a 4.5/40 for Masoli, Rivals a 4.6...
funny to me that the coaches always say they recruited him for his arm and had no idea he could run.. When a quarter back is posting a 4.5 40 time you have a pretty good idea he can run.. in some cases even RUN OVER!!
Or run Thru :lol:
freedjr
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 979
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:23 am

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by freedjr »

I just love how people put so much stock in 40 times. I read an article from Gregg Easterbrook on ESPN Page 2 that broke down just what a difference the times make and it's literally inches. I can't believe much more money a football player can make by lowering his time by .10 of a second. Here's the paragraphs that talk about it, followed by the link. Sorry, it's kind of long.

"I also hope you don't take tenths or hundredths of a second seriously, though the draftnik system surely does. Aqib Talib went 20th, to the Bucs. Before the draft, the Houston Chronicle reported Talib's stock was rising because at his pro day he ran a Wright 40-yard dash, improving on the 4.46 he ran at the combine. Set aside that it is inconceivable the timing was accurate enough to make this a statistically significant difference. Suppose the timers were flawless -- 4.42 is 0.9 percent faster than 4.46. Vernon Gholston went sixth, to Jersey/B. Before the draft, Todd McShay reported that Chris Long looked slow at 4.75, but Gholston looked fast at 4.67. Assume it's 10 yards to the quarterback, considering forward and perpendicular movement. A defensive end who runs a 4.67 would get there 7 inches before a defensive end who runs a 4.75. Leodis McKelvin went 11th, to Buffalo. Bills coach Dick Jauron said he was pleased that McKelvin is "a legitimate 4.38." Though 4.38 is half a percent faster than 4.4.

Meaningless decimals have run wild throughout football scouting and commentary. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, who went 16th to Arizona, ran the cone drill in 6.74 at the combine. Not in 6.73, not in 6.75 -- in 6.74. Absurd hundredths were scattered throughout combine results. Last year on draft day, the ESPN broadcast crew debated whether Yamon Figurs runs a 4.29 or 4.3. A player running a 4.29 would complete a 40-yard dash 3 inches ahead of a player running a 4.3. And this business of wanting to run on a "fast surface" for the best possible hundredths-of-a-second readout. Malcolm Kelly of Oklahoma ran a 4.68 on FieldTurf at the University of Oklahoma, then arranged a retest during which he ran a 4.63 on AstroTurf. So the "fast surface" improved his time by 1 percent. And NFL scouts took this seriously."


http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st ... ook/080429
User avatar
brich75
Senior
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by brich75 »

freedjr wrote:I just love how people put so much stock in 40 times. I read an article from Gregg Easterbrook on ESPN Page 2 that broke down just what a difference the times make and it's literally inches. I can't believe much more money a football player can make by lowering his time by .10 of a second. Here's the paragraphs that talk about it, followed by the link. Sorry, it's kind of long.

"I also hope you don't take tenths or hundredths of a second seriously, though the draftnik system surely does. Aqib Talib went 20th, to the Bucs. Before the draft, the Houston Chronicle reported Talib's stock was rising because at his pro day he ran a Wright 40-yard dash, improving on the 4.46 he ran at the combine. Set aside that it is inconceivable the timing was accurate enough to make this a statistically significant difference. Suppose the timers were flawless -- 4.42 is 0.9 percent faster than 4.46. Vernon Gholston went sixth, to Jersey/B. Before the draft, Todd McShay reported that Chris Long looked slow at 4.75, but Gholston looked fast at 4.67. Assume it's 10 yards to the quarterback, considering forward and perpendicular movement. A defensive end who runs a 4.67 would get there 7 inches before a defensive end who runs a 4.75. Leodis McKelvin went 11th, to Buffalo. Bills coach Dick Jauron said he was pleased that McKelvin is "a legitimate 4.38." Though 4.38 is half a percent faster than 4.4.

Meaningless decimals have run wild throughout football scouting and commentary. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, who went 16th to Arizona, ran the cone drill in 6.74 at the combine. Not in 6.73, not in 6.75 -- in 6.74. Absurd hundredths were scattered throughout combine results. Last year on draft day, the ESPN broadcast crew debated whether Yamon Figurs runs a 4.29 or 4.3. A player running a 4.29 would complete a 40-yard dash 3 inches ahead of a player running a 4.3. And this business of wanting to run on a "fast surface" for the best possible hundredths-of-a-second readout. Malcolm Kelly of Oklahoma ran a 4.68 on FieldTurf at the University of Oklahoma, then arranged a retest during which he ran a 4.63 on AstroTurf. So the "fast surface" improved his time by 1 percent. And NFL scouts took this seriously."


http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st ... ook/080429
who cares if people put stock in it? its just a measuring stick, a tool of the trade... Right now there isn't a lot to talk about we are just getting amped up for football.
And there is something to a 40 time, otherwise you would have linebackers running 4.9 and 5.0 running the ball.. I would guess that a low 40 time has something to do with the players ability to explode hit top speed quickly. you know, get through those pesky holes on the line. of course this is just my opinion.
Image
OregonMAX
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:06 am
Location: Bellevue, WA

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by OregonMAX »

inches do make a BIG difference in football though
"Huard's gonna go back to throw the ball. Sets up, looks, throws towards the corner of the endzone. It is... INTERCEPTED! INTERCEPTED! THE DUCKS HAVE THE BALL! Down to the 35! The 40! KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!!! KENNY WHEATON'S GONNA SCORE!!! 20! THE 10! TOUCHDOWN!!! KENNY WHEATON, AN INTERCEPTION!!! THE MOST IMPROBABLE FINISH TO A FOOTBALL GAME!!!"
neezy3
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:04 am

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by neezy3 »

i would love to have pryor here just for the recruiting purposes, big time players recruit good athletes just by signing up. Another bonus is that he is a lock for the nfl draft while im afraid masoli wont because of measurables. with all the negative recruiting out there and how the spread doesnt mesh with the nfl high profile players can be a big sell to prospects. still stoked on masoli even though i was a doubter at times last year, but number one prospects dont grow on trees and guys with beastly measurables dont either. Hope we get a matchup in the rose bowl to prove who the man is this year.
User avatar
bigsugarduck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by bigsugarduck »

All offensive players should be forced to run the 40 with the freeking football in their hands....that is the kind of speed the need to be measured, football speed....
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
Legions
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Terrelle-Pryor-s-fake-40?

Post by Legions »

If anything that article shows how important .01 is. Inches make a huge difference for a receiver getting in front of a defender, or a defender breaking up a pass. I mean, how many highlights are there where a pass just brushes the fingers of a defender? That .01 equaling 3 inches or whatever it was, would have been a deflected pass.
Post Reply