UOducksTK1 wrote:Seriously, not to mention inflation.
It wouldn't be fair because the teenager doing nothing all summer could write articles for days and load up, while the hard working middle class have no time to do such things and naturally they get the short end of the stick.
I see your point here (I'd like to point out I'm not a teenager lol), but how do you reward activity then? Seems to defeat the purpose...
When don't need top notch activity here. We've been running for like 40 seasons at a reasonable pace with reasonable activity. There's usually only like 5-7 GMs that are kinda slacking and not responding to PMs. Majority of the other GMs are fine.
Increasing rewards just puts more pressure on people to be more active for the sake of being active, which in turn will turn off a lot of people like me. If I'm asked to do anymore than I am now, I probably would quit. Just wouldn't have the time, when others would, giving others an unfair advantage.
I could be wrong but why not if someone writes 2 articles in a season allow them a +1 point for any player other than the one who was given the + for their previous article that season?
FlDuckFan wrote:I could be wrong but why not if someone writes 2 articles in a season allow them a +1 point for any player other than the one who was given the + for their previous article that season?
I really like that suggestion, +1 isn't much but it is something and more activity is nothing to sneeze at.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
