1993 Draft Discussion
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Draft notes for C, PF and SF are done
I will finish the SG and PG tomorrow
I will finish the SG and PG tomorrow

- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Pretty normal draft. I think we will have a few steals in later picks though. Potential will may bite some GM’s. Warning for GM’s who want to blame me later
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Draft notes are doneOregon Ownage wrote:Draft notes for C, PF and SF are done
I will finish the SG and PG tomorrow

- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
- the goat
- Freshman
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:40 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Lakers
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Hope I get to draft Adonis Jordan. Can't go wrong with a name like that
Lakers GM
- duckyoubeavers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
- GM: Toronto Raptors GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
deciding between mashburn and webber is tough. seems like mashburn could be the better scorer of the two
Raptors GM
- duckyoubeavers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
- GM: Toronto Raptors GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
also has the draft clock started even though the season hasnt ended yet?
Raptors GM
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Great question: so this doesnt get dragged out, the clock is in effectduckyoubeavers wrote:also has the draft clock started even though the season hasnt ended yet?

- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
1-2 going as expected so far. Penny seems far and away the #1.
This is where it gets muddied a bit imo. The next 3 on my list are basically equals in my eyes, just depends what you want.
Also congrats Raps on the #2. Insane.
This is where it gets muddied a bit imo. The next 3 on my list are basically equals in my eyes, just depends what you want.
Also congrats Raps on the #2. Insane.
- duckyoubeavers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
- GM: Toronto Raptors GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
appreciate it lol. its the least i deserve after moses retired on meThe Bean Regime wrote:1-2 going as expected so far. Penny seems far and away the #1.
This is where it gets muddied a bit imo. The next 3 on my list are basically equals in my eyes, just depends what you want.
Also congrats Raps on the #2. Insane.
Raptors GM
- 800wins
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:12 am
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Love how these draft notes are set up
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Mashburn at #3 is a surprise. If he can get B’s in scoring he should be fine. Probably one of the top defenders at SF coming out the DASL drafts. Defensive SF draft
Shawn Bradley had All star potential. Mashburn has franchise potential. I couldn’t go wrong with either pick
Shawn Bradley had All star potential. Mashburn has franchise potential. I couldn’t go wrong with either pick
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
Nice nice nice. Bradley was #3 on my list even with his lack of a superstar ceiling. A great rebounder/rim protector is a franchise cornerstone-piece even if they're not the star of the team (like Bol on the Grizzlies
). Hopefully his offense is closer to Bol than it is to Nevitt. If he comes in as a <5 PPG guy, then ouch. Inquired about trading up for him with the Nuggs but really I'm more of a quantity over quality rebuilder so it was unlikely anyhow (completely ignoring that he was picked before Nuggs).
Mashburn was #5 for me, but both were a part of the "3 basically equal prospects in my eyes" thing I mentioned earlier.
Mashburn was #5 for me, but both were a part of the "3 basically equal prospects in my eyes" thing I mentioned earlier.
- 800wins
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:12 am
Re: 1993 Draft Discussion
It's crazy, I had Mash #3, and Bradley #4 with a gap before my 5th guy. I'm new here though & not accustomed to the notes yetThe Bean Regime wrote:Nice nice nice. Bradley was #3 on my list even with his lack of a superstar ceiling. A great rebounder/rim protector is a franchise cornerstone-piece even if they're not the star of the team (like Bol on the Grizzlies). Hopefully his offense is closer to Bol than it is to Nevitt. If he comes in as a <5 PPG guy, then ouch. Inquired about trading up for him with the Nuggs but really I'm more of a quantity over quality rebuilder so it was unlikely anyhow (completely ignoring that he was picked before Nuggs).
Mashburn was #5 for me, but both were a part of the "3 basically equal prospects in my eyes" thing I mentioned earlier.