1996 Draft Discussion
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
Gonna wait a bit to see what response I get from putting this pick on the block
Hornets GM
-
bellsduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
This draft has been pretty long but it doesn't bother me this time cause there's been so much action
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
Priest is a stud. May have traded #2 but I think you ended with second best at least for next seasonbellsduck wrote:This draft has been pretty long but it doesn't bother me this time cause there's been so much action
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
So thought I got that trade posted in time before I went out but since BOS hasn't picked yet, I assume as long as Nets makes his pick he's fine right?
If not I'll change my pick since I definitely do not want McCarty.
Not sure what happened with Nets, he accepted the trade but then didn't make a pick
If not I'll change my pick since I definitely do not want McCarty.
Not sure what happened with Nets, he accepted the trade but then didn't make a pick
Hornets GM
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40344
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
Thanks, we cut it close because I forgot it's 3 hours, I thought it was 4.UOducksTK1 wrote:I’m fine with letting Nets still make his pick.
Hornets GM
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
Yeah I'm fine with it too, it's classic Nets behavior anyways to bend the rules
-
DrBradBuss
- Junior
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:56 pm
- GM: Detroit Pistons GM
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
Wake up Nets!
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40344
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
offtheheezy wrote:Yeah I'm fine with it too, it's classic Nets behavior anyways to bend the rules

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
- dd10snoop28
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5037
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40344
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
I think we should start a committee to investigate the Nets.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
I bet BOS wants WALTAH and that's why he was fine waiting.Craig wrote:It's past the time limit. Give 'em McCarty and move along

Hornets GM
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40344
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
Ha! It was down to Walter and Jerome, but I went with Jerome since I already got Rogers.
See, unlike the Nets, I’m actually a nice guy and consider others!!
See, unlike the Nets, I’m actually a nice guy and consider others!!

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10475
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 1996 Draft Discussion
The world need more of thisUOducksTK1 wrote: See, unlike the Nets, I’m actually a nice guy and consider others!!
