Pac-12 not dead yet

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by greenyellow »

Looks like the Pac-12 will be announcing the addition of Boise State, San Diego State, Fresno State, and Colorado State tomorrow. They still need two others to meet the NCAA minimum of 8 conference team.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by StevensTechU »

Good for them. If they can land Tulane and a Texas school or Memphis, they're in good shape. Longer term, getting Cal and Stanford back from the ACC would improve both footprint and be a major boost academically, but the latter is the reason I don't see it happening.
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by nogerO »

Maybe invite Idaho? They were D1 at one time. And they can certainly play with D1 teams.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 15118
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by OregonFan4Life »

I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
Image
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by squintsdd »

OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
I'm not positive on the details either, but I think they get paid pretty much nothing with their ACC contract, but they can leave pretty much any time with no repercussions.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40543
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Makes sense. And ya potentially getting Stanford/Cal back if ACC falls apart would get them to 8.

Colorado State was the one surprising team to see them add, but I guess they have a good market (Denver)?

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 15118
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by OregonFan4Life »

UOducksTK1 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:26 am Makes sense. And ya potentially getting Stanford/Cal back if ACC falls apart would get them to 8.

Colorado State was the one surprising team to see them add, but I guess they have a good market (Denver)?
I could see Stanford and Cal leaving before any other movement from the ACC, but I’m sure before long we’ll see Clemson, Miami, and Florida State leave the ACC.
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40543
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by UOducksTK1 »

OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:28 am
UOducksTK1 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:26 am Makes sense. And ya potentially getting Stanford/Cal back if ACC falls apart would get them to 8.

Colorado State was the one surprising team to see them add, but I guess they have a good market (Denver)?
I could see Stanford and Cal leaving before any other movement from the ACC, but I’m sure before long we’ll see Clemson, Miami, and Florida State leave the ACC.
What's their buyout?

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
duck92
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by duck92 »

To me, I think this makes it more likely that Stanford and Cal join the Big 10. They aren't going to join a conference with Boise State and Fresno State, They don't want to be associated with them because of academics.
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by squintsdd »

duck92 wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:37 am To me, I think this makes it more likely that Stanford and Cal join the Big 10. They aren't going to join a conference with Boise State and Fresno State, They don't want to be associated with them because of academics.
The Big 10 has to want/invite them. As it stands right now, they don't/haven't
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Duck07 »

Cal/Stanford signed a GOR agreement through 2036 with the ACC; the conference will either need to release them or implode as they aren't likely to pay the exit fee to join the Pac 6 and make it 8 again. ESPN reported last year that it was a 120 Million $ exit fee per ACC school so I'd assume that by joining Cal/Stanford signed up for the same deal. It's also my understanding that the ACC couldn't "release" Cal/Stanford and use that "extra" money for the other schools or Clemson/FSU because its ESPN money for additional conference schools, not the league. I think ultimately they'll mutually agree to disassociate because the travel looks even more absurd than the B1G and the ACC schools won't like coming to the Bay Area.

From last year - https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... anford-cal
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by greenyellow »

I could see them adding UTSA to get into Texas and maybe UNLV to get the Vegas market. If they wanted, they could probably get Hawaii cheap since they're not full MWC members.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by StevensTechU »

They're not gonna continue paying for mountain west teams. That makes absolutely zero sense when it would've been cheaper to merge than to buy them individually.
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Duck07 »

I think the "draw" of the "Pac 12" for any new members is that its trying to sell itself as the next best football conference in order to secure the at-large spot.

Getting Cal/Stanford back would be a definite win in that regard if the ACC pukes them back after getting a bad taste of CBD's.
I think you can scrap Air Force from this so you end up with Tulane/Memphis pairing along with Wyoming/UNLV and New Mexico/UTSA. Those 6 give you an actual Pac 12 and if you somehow grab Cal/Stanford first, they wouldn't need to expand the map as far to reach that number.
Image
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Duck07 »

StevensTechU wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 3:08 pm They're not gonna continue paying for mountain west teams. That makes absolutely zero sense when it would've been cheaper to merge than to buy them individually.
Maybe this is what happens when all the attorneys get involved in order to make it official.
Image
Post Reply