Pac-12 not dead yet

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40537
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by UOducksTK1 »

The American conference is gonna be in shambles if Tulsa, Memphis, and UTSA leave. Some FCS conferences are more interesting.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by nogerO »

greenyellow wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 2:21 pm I could see them adding UTSA to get into Texas and maybe UNLV to get the Vegas market. If they wanted, they could probably get Hawaii cheap since they're not full MWC members.
The Mountain West is currently subsidizing travel to and from Hawaii for MWC schools. It's doubtful that the New Pac would do the same. UNLV, Wyoming, Air Force, Nevada, UTSA, and Tulane would be logical choices for a 12-team conference. An influx of TV revenue could significantly improve some of these schools. It's an interesting consideration.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by greenyellow »

UNLV is now 2-0 against Big 12 teams this season as they've beaten Houston in Week 1 and now Kansas in Week 3. They might have an argument for being included.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by StevensTechU »

greenyellow wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:39 pm UNLV is now 2-0 against Big 12 teams this season as they've beaten Houston in Week 1 and now Kansas in Week 3. They might have an argument for being included.
They're also a nationally recognized brand from their glory days in basketball and add a better market than most schools. They're not a bad consolation, if needed.
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Duck07 »

StevensTechU wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:27 pm
greenyellow wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:39 pm UNLV is now 2-0 against Big 12 teams this season as they've beaten Houston in Week 1 and now Kansas in Week 3. They might have an argument for being included.
They're also a nationally recognized brand from their glory days in basketball and add a better market than most schools. They're not a bad consolation, if needed.
Blurb I read said that much like the CA school system, if you want UNLV you may have to take Nevada too or else it may not get approved.
Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11000
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by buckmarkduck »

OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
I seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventually

The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
User avatar
Alan
Senior
Posts: 4359
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:17 pm

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Alan »

buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 am
OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
I seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventually

The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
I am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11000
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by buckmarkduck »

Alan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:19 am
buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 am
OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
I seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventually

The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
I am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?
I doubt that will be the case. In fact I fully expect the SEC/BIG to negotiate that the Big 12 doesn’t have a automatic bid next negotiation.

The pac 8 will bring very small fan bases, no major markets, and no schools that recruit in the top 30 or show any real NIL to change that. They will get a far smaller tv deal than the orginal pac 12 walked away from, meaning they will have 20% of the money the sec and BIg get for TV. No way will anyone agree to give those schools an automatic bid when this current deal runs out.
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by nogerO »

Maybe they should invite San Jose State, Utah State, New Mexico State and Florida State :lol: so every team would be a something STATE.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by nogerO »

buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:30 am
Alan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:19 am
buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 am
OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
I seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventually

The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
I am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?
I doubt that will be the case. In fact I fully expect the SEC/BIG to negotiate that the Big 12 doesn’t have a automatic bid next negotiation.

The pac 8 will bring very small fan bases, no major markets, and no schools that recruit in the top 30 or show any real NIL to change that. They will get a far smaller tv deal than the orginal pac 12 walked away from, meaning they will have 20% of the money the sec and BIg get for TV. No way will anyone agree to give those schools an automatic bid when this current deal runs out.
I've said this before, there will ultimately be either two super conferences of 24 teams or one super conference of 48. The rest of the teams will be 1-A, a 48 team conference and play for a different championship. Everybody else is FCC. It's all about the $$$. It will happen, it's just a matter of time.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Duck07 »

Alan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:19 am
buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 am
OregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
I seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventually

The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
I am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?
Not a chance as it looks entirely like they're trying to angle for being the top G5 conference and essentially earn an auto-bid from being the "better" football conference.

They probably need to take the 6 they have now and make a "West" Division and then go find another 6 to make an "East" Division like Memphis, Tulane, SMU, UTSA and others.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by StevensTechU »

SMU is in the ACC, so I think they're out.

There was some clowning on OSU's messageboard on twitter because someone said the gap between the new Pac and the Big 12 was minimal. I honestly don't think that's that strong of a take. Utah and Oklahoma State are tops in the Big 12 and they're not exactly teams that Oregon State, Wazzu, Boise and Fresno would be outclassed by in most years.
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6271
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by pezsez1 »

There was some clowning on OSU's messageboard on twitter because someone said the gap between the new Pac and the Big 12 was minimal.
That might have been me who said that! :lol: I commented on some OSU post that there wasn't really much separation between the top three of the new Pac-? (6-Pac) and the top three of the Big 12. Last year's Oregon State team easily could have won the Big 12 this year.

My comment was in the context of why rebuilding the Pac was probably OSU's (and WSU's) best option. By taking the top half of the MW, adding two Power 4-tier programs, and bringing in a couple other top-tier G5 teams, the new Pac will probably be on par talent-wise with the Big 12, and it could end up with a de-facto automatic playoff berth. Still not ideal, and I'm sure OSU would have left WSU in a burning building for a Big 12 bid, but it is what it is and it could be worse.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by StevensTechU »

Articles being written that Air Force could be going to the AAC. That means they're unlikely to be picked up by the Beavs and Cougs, and could indicate that the AAC expects some attrition (Tulane, Memphis, and UTSA all targets for Pac).
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by greenyellow »

Rough day for the Pac-12 as they got turned down by USF, UTSA, Tulane, and Memphis from the AAC and then the MWC used the Pac-12's own money against them to retain UNLV, AF, SJSU, and Nevada. Only addition was Utah State but rumors are the Pac-12 may look to add Gonzaga as a full-member even without football.

Edit: With both conferences at 7 teams, it now looks like UNLV is considering the Pac-12's offer again.
Image
Post Reply