The Very Soft Cookie

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

The Very Soft Cookie

Post by StevensTechU »

Title is the name of my forthcoming children's book. I just have to write it first.

But also, Oregon is suing Carlos Locklyn (aka Mr. Soft Batch Cookie) for failing to pay his full buyout.

https://www.oregonlive.com/ducks/2025/0 ... tract.html
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2062
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: The Very Soft Cookie

Post by squintsdd »

I'm curious if Oregon returning the $200k can be used against them. I would think it would've been wiser to accept the payment with a statement in return telling him that he's still owes another 200k.
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3302
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: The Very Soft Cookie

Post by GrandpaDuck »

squintsdd wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 8:48 pm I'm curious if Oregon returning the $200k can be used against them. I would think it would've been wiser to accept the payment with a statement in return telling him that he's still owes another 200k.
The most common reason to return a partial payment is when the payment is declared "payment in full" on the payment device or an accompanying remittance statement. Accepting that payment makes it very complicated to pursue the rest of the debt even though you may not agree it is full payment.
Merganzer
Senior
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am

Re: The Very Soft Cookie

Post by Merganzer »

squintsdd wrote: Wed Apr 16, 2025 8:48 pm I'm curious if Oregon returning the $200k can be used against them. I would think it would've been wiser to accept the payment with a statement in return telling him that he's still owes another 200k.
That sure seems right to me.
Post Reply