O-Line Projections

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
UofDuck
Senior
Posts: 3928
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm

O-Line Projections

Post by UofDuck »

I’m struggling to get a sense of how the parts and pieces of our new o-line coming together will perform. Lots anxiety over this group because I’m not very plugged in on this topic. It feels like the acquired talent should be there, but will it come together quick enough.

Anybody have some insights, or even logical optimism they can share?
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by StevensTechU »

The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.

How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 14914
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by OregonFan4Life »

StevensTechU wrote:The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.

How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
What happened to the OLine? I think it was overall the weakest unit last season, it seems the OLine has progressively gotten worse the last few seasons. Hopefully that changes with the recruiting classes coming in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image
lmduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 968
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 7:22 pm

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by lmduck »

OregonFan4Life wrote:
StevensTechU wrote:The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.

How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
What happened to the OLine? I think it was overall the weakest unit last season, it seems the OLine has progressively gotten worse the last few seasons. Hopefully that changes with the recruiting classes coming in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They were a finalist for the Joe Moore award last season and the one before IIRC


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
UofDuck
Senior
Posts: 3928
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by UofDuck »

Thanks guys. I’m curious how this season will play out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by Duck07 »

Ziyare Addison is the one Fr Tackle I'll be interested in watching/hearing about because I think its probably him and Wilson as the backup Tackles.
Image
alxtw
Freshman
Posts: 1257
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by alxtw »

OregonFan4Life wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 2:19 pm
StevensTechU wrote:The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.

How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
What happened to the OLine? I think it was overall the weakest unit last season, it seems the OLine has progressively gotten worse the last few seasons. Hopefully that changes with the recruiting classes coming in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Our OLine looked alright last year mid-season. But towards the end of the season, they seemed to get progressively worse or they just didnt improve, as our opponents improved?
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: O-Line Projections

Post by StevensTechU »

They started terribly, did well through the middle of the season, and was fine toward the end of the year. Being a Moore finalist was sort of a function of no one's group standing out across the country. They should have won the damn thing the year before.
Post Reply