O-Line Projections
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- UofDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 3928
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
O-Line Projections
I’m struggling to get a sense of how the parts and pieces of our new o-line coming together will perform. Lots anxiety over this group because I’m not very plugged in on this topic. It feels like the acquired talent should be there, but will it come together quick enough.
Anybody have some insights, or even logical optimism they can share?
Anybody have some insights, or even logical optimism they can share?
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: O-Line Projections
The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.
How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 14914
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: O-Line Projections
What happened to the OLine? I think it was overall the weakest unit last season, it seems the OLine has progressively gotten worse the last few seasons. Hopefully that changes with the recruiting classes coming in.StevensTechU wrote:The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.
How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

-
lmduck
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 7:22 pm
Re: O-Line Projections
They were a finalist for the Joe Moore award last season and the one before IIRCOregonFan4Life wrote:What happened to the OLine? I think it was overall the weakest unit last season, it seems the OLine has progressively gotten worse the last few seasons. Hopefully that changes with the recruiting classes coming in.StevensTechU wrote:The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.
How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- UofDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 3928
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: O-Line Projections
Thanks guys. I’m curious how this season will play out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: O-Line Projections
Ziyare Addison is the one Fr Tackle I'll be interested in watching/hearing about because I think its probably him and Wilson as the backup Tackles.

-
alxtw
- Freshman
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm
Re: O-Line Projections
Our OLine looked alright last year mid-season. But towards the end of the season, they seemed to get progressively worse or they just didnt improve, as our opponents improved?OregonFan4Life wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 2:19 pmWhat happened to the OLine? I think it was overall the weakest unit last season, it seems the OLine has progressively gotten worse the last few seasons. Hopefully that changes with the recruiting classes coming in.StevensTechU wrote:The five best are (in order of 2024 performance, not projected performance) Emmanuel Pregnon, Poncho, World, Harkey, and Bedford (didn't play). So that's your starting 5, with World and Pregnon on the left and Bedford and Harkey on the right.
How good World and Harkey turn out to be is question #1. Question #2 is what happens if anyone goes down, because there isn't much proven after them, and the spring game wasn't kind to many of the young guys. The first three fillers, I think, are Gernorris Wilson (guard or tackle), Kawika Rogers (guard), and Charlie Picard (center). Dave Iuli might be there, too, but he has looked bad. It's another big step down after those, so tackle depth is especially thin.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: O-Line Projections
They started terribly, did well through the middle of the season, and was fine toward the end of the year. Being a Moore finalist was sort of a function of no one's group standing out across the country. They should have won the damn thing the year before.