Blazers

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10997
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers

Post by buckmarkduck »

alxtw wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 11:03 pm Blazers could have saved the money they are paying two over the hill pgs and gotten a very good player with their combined salaries. Facepalm.
Yes! Free agents flock to Portland.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Blazers

Post by Boom »

Blazers are projected to be the third worst team in the West next season. There's been multiple questionable roster building moves the past few seasons. Bringing Dame back is another strange fit. At least his contract makes it a low risk/high reward potential. Ultimately the Blazers need some 2026 lottery luck and a good ownership group for this team to start ascending in the West.
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 4910
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by Phalanx »

pezsez1 wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 10:24 am Woke up this morning and checked my clock.

It's still DAME TIME!

Image
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Blazers

Post by Duck07 »

Image
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6240
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Blazers

Post by pezsez1 »

Love all the Portland radio content today! Just a big celebration for the return of Dame, how he'll help the team, and what he means to the community. Just a great day to be a Blazer fan!

Also, I'm stoked for the first assist/scoring hookup between Dame and Yang... DANG TIME!!!
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
dd10snoop28
All Pac-12
Posts: 5037
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by dd10snoop28 »

LOOOLLL
Image
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6240
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Blazers

Post by pezsez1 »

NEW BLAZERS OWNER INCOMING LEZZZZZZZZZZZZGOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! (And still Dame time!)
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Blazers

Post by StevensTechU »

I'm liking the seeming commitment to Portland. I'm not loving (as a taxpayer) the impending fight over financing a new arena (we can support an unnecessary arena for the benefit of the wealthy but can't afford police and parks? Ok....).

I'm also very fascinated by the ownership team. Tom Dundon is poor by billionaire standards, and much of his wealth is tied up in the Carolina Hurricanes. I'd really like to know how they're structuring this deal, financially speaking.
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 4910
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by Phalanx »

The Blazers as an organization seem like the ideal distressed property that a smart investor can turn around to great advantage. Tom Dundon seems like exactly the kind of owner who recognizes that opportunity and has the chops to clean things up. I don't know what happens when a guy who hates bad contracts meets a GM who doesn't know how to originate anything else, but I suspect Cronin will be gone as soon as Dundon gets his bearings. It sounds like it takes awhile for the transfer of ownership to occur so Dundon might arrive just in time to make decisions on Sharpe and Scoot's future contracts. We can look forward to having a real owner again, and a more active owner than maybe we have ever had. I have been saying ad nauseum that the way for the Blazers to return to winning ways is to run a tighter ship in terms of cap management. Looks like we are about to find out if I am right.
Everythingsducky
Senior
Posts: 2658
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by Everythingsducky »

StevensTechU wrote: Thu Aug 14, 2025 10:04 am I'm liking the seeming commitment to Portland. I'm not loving (as a taxpayer) the impending fight over financing a new arena (we can support an unnecessary arena for the benefit of the wealthy but can't afford police and parks? Ok....).

I'm also very fascinated by the ownership team. Tom Dundon is poor by billionaire standards, and much of his wealth is tied up in the Carolina Hurricanes. I'd really like to know how they're structuring this deal, financially speaking.
Looks like he is already looking at local investors to add to the books. Tim Boyle might be one of the people to assist, per reports. Pun fully intended. But that would also most likely add to the strength of keeping the team in Portland, which has already been stated.
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6240
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Blazers

Post by pezsez1 »

I have been saying ad nauseum that the way for the Blazers to return to winning ways is to run a tighter ship in terms of cap management. Looks like we are about to find out if I am right.
I don't say this often, but you're exactly right, especially with the new CBA and the paradigm shift from super teams to roster construction. I'm excited to see what Dundon puts together & who he eventually hires as our GM going forward.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
Everythingsducky
Senior
Posts: 2658
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by Everythingsducky »

pezsez1 wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 12:07 am
I have been saying ad nauseum that the way for the Blazers to return to winning ways is to run a tighter ship in terms of cap management. Looks like we are about to find out if I am right.
I don't say this often, but you're exactly right, especially with the new CBA and the paradigm shift from super teams to roster construction. I'm excited to see what Dundon puts together & who he eventually hires as our GM going forward.
Did Dundon clean house in Carolina when he bought them?
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Blazers

Post by StevensTechU »

Everythingsducky wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 12:02 am
StevensTechU wrote: Thu Aug 14, 2025 10:04 am I'm liking the seeming commitment to Portland. I'm not loving (as a taxpayer) the impending fight over financing a new arena (we can support an unnecessary arena for the benefit of the wealthy but can't afford police and parks? Ok....).

I'm also very fascinated by the ownership team. Tom Dundon is poor by billionaire standards, and much of his wealth is tied up in the Carolina Hurricanes. I'd really like to know how they're structuring this deal, financially speaking.
Looks like he is already looking at local investors to add to the books. Tim Boyle might be one of the people to assist, per reports. Pun fully intended. But that would also most likely add to the strength of keeping the team in Portland, which has already been stated.
I find it really interesting that they've announced the purchase and don't even know what the ownership group consists of. I mean, it happens, investors announce deals months in advance while funding is still coming together, but it's interesting to me nonetheless. I guess I just haven't seen it as much in sports.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Blazers

Post by Boom »

StevensTechU wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 3:27 pm
Everythingsducky wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 12:02 am
StevensTechU wrote: Thu Aug 14, 2025 10:04 am I'm liking the seeming commitment to Portland. I'm not loving (as a taxpayer) the impending fight over financing a new arena (we can support an unnecessary arena for the benefit of the wealthy but can't afford police and parks? Ok....).

I'm also very fascinated by the ownership team. Tom Dundon is poor by billionaire standards, and much of his wealth is tied up in the Carolina Hurricanes. I'd really like to know how they're structuring this deal, financially speaking.
Looks like he is already looking at local investors to add to the books. Tim Boyle might be one of the people to assist, per reports. Pun fully intended. But that would also most likely add to the strength of keeping the team in Portland, which has already been stated.
I find it really interesting that they've announced the purchase and don't even know what the ownership group consists of. I mean, it happens, investors announce deals months in advance while funding is still coming together, but it's interesting to me nonetheless. I guess I just haven't seen it as much in sports.
I don't think the NBA or the Blazers have officially announced anything yet. There could be dozens of minority investors when this becomes official.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Blazers

Post by StevensTechU »

Boom wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 5:17 pm
StevensTechU wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 3:27 pm
Everythingsducky wrote: Fri Aug 15, 2025 12:02 am
StevensTechU wrote: Thu Aug 14, 2025 10:04 am I'm liking the seeming commitment to Portland. I'm not loving (as a taxpayer) the impending fight over financing a new arena (we can support an unnecessary arena for the benefit of the wealthy but can't afford police and parks? Ok....).

I'm also very fascinated by the ownership team. Tom Dundon is poor by billionaire standards, and much of his wealth is tied up in the Carolina Hurricanes. I'd really like to know how they're structuring this deal, financially speaking.
Looks like he is already looking at local investors to add to the books. Tim Boyle might be one of the people to assist, per reports. Pun fully intended. But that would also most likely add to the strength of keeping the team in Portland, which has already been stated.
I find it really interesting that they've announced the purchase and don't even know what the ownership group consists of. I mean, it happens, investors announce deals months in advance while funding is still coming together, but it's interesting to me nonetheless. I guess I just haven't seen it as much in sports.
I don't think the NBA or the Blazers have officially announced anything yet. There could be dozens of minority investors when this becomes official.
I forget what the cap on what the max number of owners is, but I think it's around twenty.

Edit: It's 25.
Post Reply